No, it probably means we will get more and worse than ever.
Joel Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 11:25:25 PM
I think he was waiting until he secured the nomination to pull out his more controversial ideas, like federally-mandated huts for women to live in during their periods.
It has already started, as Tom pointed out: Even by MI we were treated to the spectacle of Santorum robocalling MI Dems begging for their votes to stop Romney, despite once lambasting Democrats "spoiling" Republican primaries. Those must have been interesting calls; he could hardly say, "a vote for me is a vote for Obama," since Romney would have skewered him with that throughout the remaining primaries. As it is, he has already told a press conference Santorum was "wearing the other teams jersey," and nothing like Romney voting for Tsongas in 1992 solely to give Bush 41 an easier opponent than Clinton.

Yet as the delegate math becomes increasingly impossible for Santorum he will only get more desperate, frantic and pathetic. Expecting otherwise would be expecting him to know when he is licked, and if he knew that he would have retired after Bob Casey thumped him by almost 20% in PA six years ago. The only thing he has going for him against Romney is playing the "real conservative" card, so he will milk it for all it is worth. With a primary left in Gingrichs adopted GA, the only reason we will not see Santorum in a white sheet by the weekend is because he is Catholic.
If nothing else, while the notion of Romney running with Ron Paul is absurd, a marriage of convenience between Romney and Santorum is more plausible. Santorum brings something to the table (his sizable pull with conservative voters, which Paul utterly lacks.) Staying in the race and finishing a respectable second in every primary would deepen his appeal as a running mate, and about the only way Romney can get rid of him before the end of spring would be to publicly make the offer, which he could not rescind without completely destroying his credibility with everyone.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 01/03/2012 at 11:30:17 PM
Now That Romney Is Officially the Republican Presidential Nominee: Pick the President!
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1462 Views
- 29/02/2012 08:29:02 PM
1462 Views
I agree Romney will be the candidate.
- 29/02/2012 08:54:52 PM
779 Views
I would say the math favors Romney over Obama, but it will probably be close either way.
- 01/03/2012 03:37:52 PM
862 Views
I have never understood the point of the Electoral College.
- 29/02/2012 11:39:11 PM
850 Views
You don't think like a politician then
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
909 Views
- 01/03/2012 12:38:36 AM
909 Views
I certainly hadn't considered much of that. I'm glad you posted it. *NM*
- 01/03/2012 07:15:03 AM
375 Views
I also have not seen most of that mentioned in the popular vs. electoral debate.
- 01/03/2012 02:34:31 PM
783 Views
a bit simplistic and unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:44:02 PM
841 Views
When illustrating a point realism is not required and simplicity is a plus
- 03/03/2012 03:04:26 AM
866 Views
I have a couple quibbles.
- 03/03/2012 05:23:46 AM
881 Views
Oh, certainly, I'm over-generalizing but I was already getting long-winded
- 03/03/2012 06:52:04 AM
809 Views
What a bunch of waffle!
- 03/03/2012 10:47:19 AM
978 Views
Also I don't like this refrain that implies only the POTUS vote matters
- 03/03/2012 03:29:58 AM
983 Views
IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 05:57:41 AM
784 Views
Re: IMHO, parliaments choosing prime ministers is LESS democratic than the electoral college.
- 03/03/2012 07:02:30 AM
814 Views
*is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:49:42 PM
808 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 04/03/2012 09:56:16 PM
852 Views
Re: *is learning*
- 05/03/2012 12:08:08 AM
880 Views
You could imitate the French.
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
799 Views
- 07/03/2012 10:40:16 PM
799 Views
That seems... unlikely....
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
811 Views
- 08/03/2012 03:03:54 PM
811 Views
It does, doesn't it?
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
983 Views
- 08/03/2012 06:11:08 PM
983 Views
After I thought about it more, I realized France and the US are not so different in that respect.
- 08/03/2012 08:51:03 PM
758 Views
More similar than the other major Western democracies at least, agreed.
- 08/03/2012 09:32:55 PM
759 Views
I did not realize lack of a parliamentary majority dictated his cabinet.
- 09/03/2012 12:27:31 AM
828 Views
I don't know much about Norwegian politics, but you seem to be wrong.
- 03/03/2012 06:18:08 PM
839 Views
Do you happen to have that link, please?
- 03/03/2012 06:46:31 PM
715 Views
Sure.
- 03/03/2012 06:58:07 PM
901 Views
Guess we did not read far enough.
- 03/03/2012 10:38:07 PM
834 Views
Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 03/03/2012 11:49:44 PM
1051 Views
Hey, man, I am an AMERICAN: I do not HAVE to know ANYTHING!
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1045 Views
- 04/03/2012 11:46:57 PM
1045 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 05/03/2012 06:56:24 AM
837 Views
The thing is, regions often have national relevance far greater than their populations would suggest
- 05/03/2012 10:21:26 AM
803 Views
Re: Yeah, you have to know a few things about European politics...
- 08/03/2012 07:11:12 PM
786 Views
Many valid reasons, including those Isaac cited.
- 02/03/2012 02:26:37 AM
947 Views
Most states are ignored anyway
- 02/03/2012 11:56:12 PM
1003 Views
Only because and to the extent they have already committed themselves.
- 03/03/2012 03:41:39 AM
855 Views
Why would we do something logical? Dude, you're utterly ridiculous. *NM*
- 05/03/2012 04:53:38 PM
429 Views
I'm kind of sad- does this mean Santorum won't be providing wonderful sound bites anymore?
- 01/03/2012 02:22:31 PM
768 Views
No, it probably means we will get more and worse than ever.
- 01/03/2012 11:25:25 PM
946 Views
Romney or Obama, either way, America loses. *NM*
- 02/03/2012 01:10:26 AM
594 Views
Hard to dispute that either; six of one, half a dozen of the other.
- 02/03/2012 01:38:07 AM
742 Views
I'd agree hope and change was extremely unrealistic
- 02/03/2012 11:58:57 PM
749 Views
Well, you know my story there; I voted for Obama and got Hillary (at best.)
- 03/03/2012 01:43:20 AM
777 Views
Update: Despite rules requiring they be split, the MI GOP is giving Romney BOTH statewide delegates.
- 02/03/2012 11:10:56 PM
862 Views
Romney is damaged
- 02/03/2012 11:27:33 PM
751 Views
Obama is rather damaged also; it will probably come down to FL and OH, yet again.
- 03/03/2012 02:23:53 AM
887 Views
I'm hoping for Rubio as VP... then FL probably won't matter
- 03/03/2012 04:28:08 AM
744 Views
You should put that on your license plates.
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
870 Views
- 03/03/2012 06:41:34 AM
870 Views
And what are you basing all of this on?
- 03/03/2012 09:54:06 PM
856 Views
The closeness of several states when Obama was far more popular, and UTs heavily Mormon neighbors.
- 03/03/2012 11:44:06 PM
819 Views
Wrong
- 04/03/2012 08:08:56 AM
944 Views
Higher turnout magnifies the Mormon effect.
- 04/03/2012 08:08:09 PM
989 Views
Your reasoning is flawed and if you can't see it there is no hope for you
- 05/03/2012 11:39:04 PM
905 Views
Yeah, I think we had that conversation already, several times, in fact.
- 07/03/2012 05:36:45 AM
729 Views
Do you have any knowledge of statistics at all?
- 07/03/2012 09:04:15 PM
896 Views
I hate this message board
- 07/03/2012 09:06:30 PM
687 Views
It would probably help if you deleted the stuff from two, three posts back?
- 07/03/2012 09:25:40 PM
798 Views


