Active Users:367 Time:04/12/2025 12:30:21 PM
Bull. Shit. Tom Send a noteboard - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM
Just admit you're wrong and don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Iconoclasm was a non-issue in the Schism. The turmoil it caused in the East only tangentially led to the Schism in that Rome's interference gave it, centuries later, a precedent for papal supremacy. Period.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West? - 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM 1488 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM* - 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM 441 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? - 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM 692 Views
If the divine made men... - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM 679 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine. - 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM 703 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed. - 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM 720 Views
Thanks? It is all Dans fault, really. - 10/03/2012 07:21:19 AM 987 Views
But you do comparable things all the time! - 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM 925 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable - 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM 811 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have. - 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM 771 Views
... and apparently it was a waste of time - 11/03/2012 03:27:04 AM 701 Views
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM 768 Views
Basically what Isaac said. *NM* - 10/03/2012 07:22:07 PM 377 Views
who? *NM* - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM 354 Views
Me - 11/03/2012 03:31:51 AM 752 Views
You're right and wrong. - 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM 1155 Views
Re: You're right and wrong. - 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM 1051 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged - 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM 1044 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world. - 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM 855 Views
Yeah, that's very true. - 11/03/2012 03:27:09 PM 949 Views
My Buddhist readings are definitely Tibet-focused. - 11/03/2012 04:00:17 PM 1000 Views
Duplicate post *NM* - 11/03/2012 03:28:58 PM 457 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"? - 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM 880 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism. - 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM 795 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM 898 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship. - 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM 900 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM 772 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM 836 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM 908 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal. - 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM 973 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου. - 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM 955 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next? - 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM 843 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp. - 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM 762 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself. - 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM 911 Views
I'm not telling you to; God is. - 13/03/2012 12:35:45 AM 670 Views
Or can only you use that sort of specious logic? *NM* - 13/03/2012 03:50:20 PM 340 Views
And re: particular bullshit - 11/03/2012 02:33:15 PM 865 Views
Re: And re: particular bullshit - 13/03/2012 12:07:42 AM 780 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong. - 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM 1058 Views

Reply to Message