I pretty much agree with most of what you said there, though.
I would also add that, as much as Democratic "disenfranchisement" arguments disgust me, the linked video in this original post is probably conveniently ignoring one very important proof of identity: the person's signature. If DC is anything like New York, what that person was asking him to do in order to get a ballot was sign the book. Since a copy of the signature is already there, printed out, the person would then compare the two signatures. If they weren't similar, the person at the polling site would likely report potential voter fraud (and the guy in the video would have just shot the evidence needed to put him in jail).
As a result, you need to know the name, the address and be able to fake the signature of the person you're trying to vote for. Not impossible for some, but a lot harder than it looks and certainly not something that crazy homeless people are going to be able to accomplish.
In short, though, free ID cards = solution.
I would also add that, as much as Democratic "disenfranchisement" arguments disgust me, the linked video in this original post is probably conveniently ignoring one very important proof of identity: the person's signature. If DC is anything like New York, what that person was asking him to do in order to get a ballot was sign the book. Since a copy of the signature is already there, printed out, the person would then compare the two signatures. If they weren't similar, the person at the polling site would likely report potential voter fraud (and the guy in the video would have just shot the evidence needed to put him in jail).
As a result, you need to know the name, the address and be able to fake the signature of the person you're trying to vote for. Not impossible for some, but a lot harder than it looks and certainly not something that crazy homeless people are going to be able to accomplish.
In short, though, free ID cards = solution.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ.....
09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
- 747 Views

The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out...
*NM*
09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
- 184 Views

Why is it ironic?
09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM
- 490 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle
10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM
- 379 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems.....
10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM
- 367 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest
10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM
- 378 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law)
10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM
- 533 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
- 357 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote
10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM
- 329 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test?
10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM
- 323 Views
I don't know about permanently...
10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM
- 347 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison?
10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM
- 433 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one
10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM
- 344 Views
Well, that is simply ridiculous then, and merits no consideration.
10/04/2012 11:53:04 PM
- 442 Views
To play Devil's Advocate, there's some legitimacy to the concept
11/04/2012 04:24:37 AM
- 390 Views
Sounds like people deliberately missing the point more than anything.
11/04/2012 07:45:40 AM
- 424 Views
Ohio? When? *NM*
10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM
- 132 Views
2008.
10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM
- 329 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties.
10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM
- 300 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities
10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM
- 332 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong
10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM
- 343 Views
well, to be fair, it *has* been 8 years
11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
- 420 Views

Fair Enough, my 'memory' is mostly google based on this anyway, from about a year ago and now
11/04/2012 04:00:57 AM
- 405 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true
10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM
- 382 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply
10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM
- 350 Views
Then demonstrate that by having the courtesy to rebut it or withdraw your remarks
10/04/2012 06:30:52 AM
- 403 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters.
10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM
- 417 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one
10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM
- 371 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain
10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM
- 510 Views
The fact that it's possible doesn't mean it's widespread, nor that every countermeasure is justified *NM*
10/04/2012 11:57:16 AM
- 148 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me.
10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM
- 429 Views
It's frightening when I agree with you.
10/04/2012 02:52:23 PM
- 348 Views