Active Users:326 Time:13/07/2025 11:13:14 AM
I never did get that fuss about "literally". Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM
I like using "they" as a gender-neutral singular pronoun (provided that the accompanying verb is conjugated in the plural to agree with "they" ), and most of the other points are the same ones that I make regularly (i.e., split infinitives are not mistakes and never have been, there's nothing wrong with the passive voice, you feel good unless you're trying to describe how attuned your tactile senses are, in which case you can say you feel well). However, the misuse of "literally" is really misuse. Cracked can try to put a spin on it, but even they seem to realize that it's pushing the envelope a bit.

I mean, surely we can agree that in the kind of sentence we are talking about here, using "figuratively" instead would be utterly idiotic. Nobody would ever say "He is figuratively the creepiest dude in the universe" (except perhaps to prove a point in this discussion). You either put "literally" or you put nothing at all. So using "literally" there isn't a grammar issue, nor is it a vocabulary issue. It's an exaggeration issue - part of a rather widespread tendency in popular speech to use extreme hyperbole to humorous or emphatic effect. I don't see why that word is singled out any more than the million other ways of doing that (no, that actually wasn't intentional until I read it again and noticed).
Reply to message
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap. - 26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM 705 Views
I love cracked. - 26/04/2012 01:51:06 AM 318 Views
I almost completely agree with them. - 26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM 439 Views
I only had a problem with that last one too - 26/04/2012 03:14:39 AM 344 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally". - 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM 402 Views
It's all about usage. - 27/04/2012 04:13:52 PM 319 Views

Reply to Message