The simple fact that they are pissed means he failed regardless of how justified or unjustified the anger is. I won't even try to defend it that point I was simply curious if the outrage was really as high as the morning cable guys seemed to making it out to be and if so why. My personal belief is that you are correct most don't care and once the ceremonies start tonight (have they started already) the last thing on 99.9% of the British people's mind will be Mitt Romney. I did have a chance to look at the BBC website and the Romney isn't on the front page anywhere.
Are the British really that thin skinned?
- 27/07/2012 03:25:44 PM
1084 Views
No, just great believers in good manners and courtesy
- 27/07/2012 04:12:01 PM
773 Views
Thats good. I thought maybe they just hated Romney but you have cleared that up *NM*
- 27/07/2012 04:42:05 PM
342 Views
Yeah, the average British person just about knew his name and that he was some politician
- 28/07/2012 10:00:26 AM
672 Views
I still haven't figured out how it was offensive but it apparently was *NM*
- 27/07/2012 04:43:23 PM
316 Views
*NM*
I think you have to be careful, because you can't see it the way they do.
- 27/07/2012 05:23:22 PM
768 Views
That is why I possed it as a question
- 27/07/2012 06:12:43 PM
706 Views
Yeah sure, we never get upset by stuff like this. 
- 27/07/2012 06:47:59 PM
794 Views
- 27/07/2012 06:47:59 PM
794 Views
It's more likely the press making a big deal out of nothing.
- 27/07/2012 05:35:20 PM
673 Views
That was what it seemed like to me. The "Mr. Leader" thing was sort of funny, though.
- 27/07/2012 08:16:11 PM
743 Views
It's more been a critique on his ability to be a statesman
- 27/07/2012 06:42:35 PM
720 Views
I agree he practiced poor statesmanship
- 27/07/2012 07:52:17 PM
756 Views
Is anything ever as bad as the morning cable guys make it out to be? *NM*
- 27/07/2012 08:48:32 PM
328 Views
The way they were going you would think he had goosed the queen *NM*
- 27/07/2012 09:40:59 PM
318 Views