Active Users:481 Time:27/10/2026 08:43:11 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I actually agree with you. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 27/08/2012 06:36:55 AM
Unless they can prove with empirical evidence that Lance took performance enhancing drugs, they should have no right to strip him of his medals. And from what I've read, they have asserted that he's taken PED, but they have never proven it.
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - Victim of Witch Hunt of Epic Proportions Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 04:22:24 PM 1436 Views
Miguel Indurain - supports Lance Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 04:54:28 PM 1366 Views
You realize you're going to make Snoop's head explode, right? *NM* ßelals Girl - 25/08/2012 08:29:16 PM 682 Views
And he does have a very large head. This could get dangerous. nossy - 25/08/2012 09:14:27 PM 1022 Views
HA! HA! Lance Armstrong must have kicked his dog or something. Anonymous2000 - 25/08/2012 10:20:31 PM 1045 Views
You assume I think his trolling has any credibility, it seems. *NM* snoopcester - 26/08/2012 05:14:45 PM 516 Views
Lighten up a hair, would you? ßelals Girl - 26/08/2012 05:44:28 PM 1064 Views
I'm just sayinghe is well known for trolling snoopcester - 26/08/2012 05:46:33 PM 1073 Views
Snoop = coward.....he turns tail and runs Anonymous2000 - 26/08/2012 05:50:43 PM 1061 Views
Oh dear Anonymous2000 would you be so kind as to show a thread of maturity? *NM* Stephen - 26/08/2012 06:43:11 PM 516 Views
You're like a fourteen-year-old flailing at the keys. Nate - 26/08/2012 07:20:25 PM 1018 Views
And testicular cancer, a known side effect of steroid abuse. Joel - 26/08/2012 02:44:18 AM 1315 Views
Wow. Using his cancer as evidence against him. You've sunk to a new low. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/08/2012 12:02:32 PM 536 Views
+1 - D-bag comment from Joel. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 26/08/2012 05:48:50 PM 516 Views
Meh. You have not responded to my POSTS, rather than their author, for several years. Joel - 26/08/2012 10:44:52 PM 1027 Views
I just did. Using someone's life-threatening illness in an attempt to discredit them is disgusting. Ghavrel - 27/08/2012 04:41:52 AM 1023 Views
Using an illness doping commonly causes as evidence of doping is reasonable. Joel - 27/08/2012 04:57:01 AM 1096 Views
What is your source that it 'commonly causes' it? Isaac - 27/08/2012 06:15:39 AM 1177 Views
You are right, I should not have said, "causes," but "is associated with." Joel - 27/08/2012 07:38:36 AM 1304 Views
So, you screwed the pooch and have been proven wrong. Time for you to apologize. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 28/08/2012 05:00:51 AM 522 Views
Fine: I am sorry I did not say, "And testicular cancer, known to be associated with steroid abuse." Joel - 28/08/2012 06:20:03 AM 1375 Views
It's also a side-effect of cycling Sidious - 26/08/2012 04:46:25 PM 1554 Views
Fair point. Joel - 26/08/2012 10:41:21 PM 1068 Views
shut up Joel, just shut up *NM* Yunalesca - 26/08/2012 05:42:52 PM 548 Views
No? Joel - 26/08/2012 10:52:06 PM 1104 Views
Stir it up, stir it up... *NM* everynametaken - 26/08/2012 09:11:55 AM 615 Views
I actually agree with you. Great Lord of Chaos - 27/08/2012 06:36:55 AM 1241 Views
They have no evidence whatsoever. Most folks agree with us, as per numerous..... Anonymous2000 - 28/08/2012 05:04:37 AM 1048 Views
Not to rain on your parade or anything, as I'm not entirely convinced either, but... Legolas - 28/08/2012 10:07:56 PM 1057 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes