Active Users:400 Time:02/05/2025 02:44:38 AM
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
as a personal example, i got a tax refund last year. therefore, i qualify for the 46-47% who "paid no income tax".

I have never heard/didn't realize that people who paid more than their federal income tax liability and therefore received a refund are included in the oft-repeated stat about "half the country" (or 47%, etc.) not paying income tax. I assumed that was referring to people who after EIC/deduction/etc. had zero or negative tax liability, therefore getting back all they paid or more than they paid, which isn't the same...at all.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1041 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 606 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 714 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 584 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 576 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 646 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 675 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 622 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 242 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 595 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 555 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 533 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 505 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 497 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 523 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 553 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 580 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 533 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 552 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 501 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 507 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 520 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 229 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 671 Views

Reply to Message