Active Users:3546 Time:14/09/2026 07:37:42 AM
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. nossy Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.


Recent, maybe?

And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1210 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 756 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 882 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 755 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 756 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 807 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 862 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 776 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 320 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 778 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 736 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 690 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 665 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 671 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 688 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 731 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 730 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 696 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 711 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 664 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 678 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 681 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 303 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 854 Views

Reply to Message