Active Users:2288 Time:02/05/2026 01:03:28 AM
You gave that away with your first post snoopcester Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM
Recent, maybe? :P


I meant what I said. Jerk.

And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.


I don't think it is the same thing at all. Firstly, he did supposedly ask Ryan for ten years for returns, so why does he deserve more from his prospective VP than the voters deserve from a prospective president? He's standing on his record as a money maker (I would say job creator but I believe it is a matter of debate if he actually created more than he destroyed and where jobs he created were) - how he got it is relevant.

Really, why is he unwilling to show his tax returns - isn't he proud of his financial success and keen to show people how smart he is in looking after his money? Apart from that, I'm not sure what else he actually stands on. Though that might now have changed, with the release nearly an hour of him speaking in private on his views...


also, in terms of the IRS - it is worth remembering how limited they are. They're never going to be close to being able to carefully check even a fraction of the tax returns that come in... and someone like Romney is likely to be employing a number of accountants on higher salaries than the best the IRS has is on (kinda like someone owning 50 acres in which they might have buried a chest of gold, how long do you spend ignoring the rest of your job to look in case it is there?) - under those circumstances it is a lot easier to get away with tax evasion than get caught. Not that I'm saying he has been guilty of tax evasion, just the idea the IRS would have caught it doesn't hold that much water with me.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
This message last edited by snoopcester on 18/09/2012 at 11:56:39 PM
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1151 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 711 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 835 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 700 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 701 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 756 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 806 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 730 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 296 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 722 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 679 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 639 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 612 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 622 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 635 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 677 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 676 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 646 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 663 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 618 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 630 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 629 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 275 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 799 Views

Reply to Message