Active Users:1875 Time:02/05/2026 04:42:17 AM
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
as a personal example, i got a tax refund last year. therefore, i qualify for the 46-47% who "paid no income tax".

I have never heard/didn't realize that people who paid more than their federal income tax liability and therefore received a refund are included in the oft-repeated stat about "half the country" (or 47%, etc.) not paying income tax. I assumed that was referring to people who after EIC/deduction/etc. had zero or negative tax liability, therefore getting back all they paid or more than they paid, which isn't the same...at all.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1152 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 712 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 836 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 702 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 704 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 759 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 809 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 731 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 298 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 725 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 680 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 641 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 614 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 624 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 636 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 680 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 677 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 647 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 664 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 619 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 632 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 631 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 277 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 800 Views

Reply to Message