"Anyone" means "anyone;" perhaps you have a writing comprehension problem.
Joel Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 03:39:11 AM
I didn't vote for one position in one year of my voting lifetime. I have been voting for 18 years, say 8 positions on each ballot, so I voted for 143 positions out of 144.
Are you trying to be stupid or does it come natural?
Are you trying to be stupid or does it come natural?
For that matter, "every year" means "every year," but your last comments meaning was clear, albeit misstated. Your first was NOT; if you meant you voted in all elections EXCEPT the presidential one you should have said that, instead of that you voted for NO ONE (which is what you did say, deliberately or not.)
I am proud to not cast a vote for GWB's second term or moron Kerry. I'm sorry that you are a robot and have to vote for the D in every election, regardless of the quality of the candidate. I guess I just expect more.
I am sorry you are under the mistaken impression there are only two candidates in each race (or perhaps just the presidential race?
) As it happens, I voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in 2008, for the first time since 1996; he abused my gamble on his unlikely sincerity, and I will not repeat my error this year.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Taxes and Charity
- 23/09/2012 04:57:07 AM
1232 Views
Proof that Burr is .....
- 23/09/2012 05:05:37 AM
693 Views
- 23/09/2012 05:05:37 AM
693 Views
Voting.
- 23/09/2012 06:43:12 AM
796 Views
Joel = Fool ; I vote every year, are you just saying random things now? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 01:42:49 AM
277 Views
"I am proud to say that I didn't vote for anyone in 2004."-Anonymous2000
- 25/09/2012 01:52:00 AM
884 Views
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
- 25/09/2012 02:54:28 AM
677 Views
- 25/09/2012 02:54:28 AM
677 Views
"Anyone" means "anyone;" perhaps you have a writing comprehension problem.
- 25/09/2012 03:39:11 AM
695 Views
Joel = Moron
- 25/09/2012 04:37:15 AM
701 Views
The statement was ambiguous, hence I was not the only one who read it as I did.
- 25/09/2012 05:19:46 AM
759 Views
I imagine much of Romney's charitable giving is to the Mormon Church.
- 23/09/2012 12:08:45 PM
752 Views
Almost all of my charitable giving goes to Mercy Corps
- 23/09/2012 03:48:30 PM
715 Views
I would argue that "our society" includes the rest of the world as well. *NM*
- 26/09/2012 03:24:02 PM
297 Views
Is the Mormon Church not part of society? But that issue is part of why I favor taxation. *NM*
- 23/09/2012 10:14:39 PM
281 Views
I'm part of society too. Does that mean I'm as worthy a recipient of money as the public purse? *NM*
- 23/09/2012 10:37:31 PM
329 Views
If you can get the IRS to certify you as a 501(c)(3), then yes. If not, no. *NM*
- 23/09/2012 11:07:13 PM
293 Views
To whatever extent that we should support charity beyond taxation, yes, you are, IMO.
- 24/09/2012 03:56:31 AM
677 Views
I agree with you
- 24/09/2012 11:25:14 AM
2093 Views
I DISagree with both of you.
- 25/09/2012 02:36:05 AM
2019 Views
Re: I DISagree with both of you.
- 25/09/2012 02:26:16 PM
990 Views
The difference there is between non-profit and for-profit organizations.
- 26/09/2012 04:09:00 AM
704 Views
At the risk of sounding like a fundamentalist...
- 23/09/2012 11:05:14 PM
737 Views
Local symphonies are usually charities
- 23/09/2012 11:21:07 PM
723 Views
Yes - cultural and educational non-profits are usually tax-deductible.
- 24/09/2012 01:57:13 PM
685 Views
Re: Yes - cultural and educational non-profits are usually tax-deductible.
- 24/09/2012 02:58:17 PM
802 Views
will you count Scientology as a church?
- 26/09/2012 03:26:53 PM
731 Views
Unrelated business income is taxable under IRC 511. You know that.
- 27/09/2012 11:31:45 PM
708 Views
Let's look at this from a different point of view....
- 24/09/2012 11:51:43 PM
672 Views
I covered that point of view in my response.
- 25/09/2012 03:31:38 AM
829 Views
- 25/09/2012 03:31:38 AM
829 Views
I routinely do not read your posts (including this one)... Too long.
- 25/09/2012 04:12:24 PM
698 Views
Relating a typically long and tortuous experience with (private) bureaucracy was itself protracted.
- 26/09/2012 04:15:35 AM
667 Views

