Clearly not, since the voter had to (heavily) coach the machine.
Joel Send a noteboard - 11/11/2012 06:34:41 PM
Yeah, I know it was a joke, I just have a hard time laughing about unverifiable election results. They stopped being funny in 2000, and got worse in 2004.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 11/11/2012 at 06:35:05 PM
No, Really, Whom Do You Prefer: Romney, or Romney?
- 06/11/2012 09:57:15 PM
763 Views
Sounds more like the technology being used just isn't up to the job
- 06/11/2012 10:18:05 PM
483 Views
Here's my problem with that: How often does clicking a static link here take you to the wrong page?
- 07/11/2012 02:09:08 PM
326 Views
Maybe, I hope so; I would be a lot more comfortable with a verifiable auditable paper trail.
- 11/11/2012 06:33:47 PM
350 Views
The machine is smarter than the voter...what do you know... *NM*
- 06/11/2012 10:35:49 PM
140 Views
Clearly not, since the voter had to (heavily) coach the machine.
- 11/11/2012 06:34:41 PM
274 Views
Re: No, Really, Whom Do You Prefer: Romney, or Romney?
- 07/11/2012 02:31:55 PM
331 Views
Just because FL and OH Republicans failed to steal it does not mean it was for lack of trying.
- 11/11/2012 06:40:49 PM
449 Views
Joel, that last sentence of yours seems unfair. *NM*
- 07/11/2012 04:00:45 PM
159 Views
Only in retrospect; Scott King and Jon Husted tried every dirty trick to steal FL and OH for Romney.
- 11/11/2012 06:29:27 PM
359 Views
That's as may be.
- 12/11/2012 01:57:34 PM
344 Views
I concede there is no proof machines changed peoples votes w/ the PA GOPs knowledge and complicity.
- 12/11/2012 04:22:39 PM
342 Views