Active Users:206 Time:18/05/2024 11:48:56 AM
Am I missing something? Nate Send a noteboard - 03/12/2012 08:18:25 PM
I consider it revealing that the US MILITARY objected on the grounds of danger to human life, while the scientific communitys only concern was contaminating the lifeless lunar surface. That kind of inverts the popular view of scientists as noble idealists who alone stand between soullessly homocidal generals and murderous abuse of technology.


Well, first of all, the article said that the scientists "also" registered concerns about the dust thing, not that they "only" registered concerns about it. For all we know, they were concerned about the danger to human life as well. I'm not sure your interpretation is justified.

Second, how did you get your headline about Sagan advising them to nuke the moon? All the article says is that Sagan did some calculations for them as part of the planning. Sounds more likely that he was part of a team contracted to look at the feasibility, since he was "a young graduate student". The article says that his calculations were related to the release of dust and gas, not that he was the chief proponent (or even a proponent) of the project. So I'm not sure how you go from there to Sagan advising the military to nuke the moon. Advising them on some of the potential consequences of nuking the moon, it rather sounds like.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This message last edited by Nate on 03/12/2012 at 08:20:16 PM
Reply to message
Carl Sagan Advised US Defense Department to Win the Space Race by Nuking the Moon - 02/12/2012 05:04:40 PM 697 Views
Way to jump the shark, Carl. *NM* - 02/12/2012 06:48:30 PM 152 Views
Agreed - 06/12/2012 12:17:16 AM 436 Views
Am I missing something? - 03/12/2012 08:18:25 PM 478 Views
Perhaps Sagans subsequent suggestion we nuke Mars to make it habitable. - 05/12/2012 11:00:08 PM 437 Views
Re: Journalists - 05/12/2012 11:27:10 PM 461 Views

Reply to Message