Active Users:774 Time:14/10/2025 04:24:05 AM
actually..... moondog Send a noteboard - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM
SCOTUS ruled that Florida had to follow their own laws, that existed at the time of the election, not change them on the fly.


they ruled that florida should do a full recount, but that doing a full recount would harm the winner (bush), and they took their time to decide the case such that FL did not have time to do the full recount by the date the results needed to be certified.

it's still beside the fact that the FL supreme court should have been the deciding factor in the case, but now that it's history there is no point in arguing it anymore...
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 1155 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 689 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 310 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 661 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 616 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 724 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 736 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 644 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 639 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 726 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 645 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 686 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 270 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 643 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 676 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 652 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 553 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 790 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 693 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 383 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 720 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 662 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 684 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 620 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 682 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 600 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 683 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 380 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 655 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 623 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 287 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 692 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 790 Views

Reply to Message