Active Users:396 Time:04/07/2026 08:45:14 PM
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance moondog Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
it's how much the malpractice insurance IS. Even for vets it's a reasonable chunk of change--I can't imagine what it is for doctors.

A doctor has to balance his expenses and income in order to eat, correct? Correct. If he has to pay malpractice, he raise his income which derives from his prices (thus his prices go up). The more malpractice is (and it's quite high), the more his prices need to go up (I'm assuming is other expenses are relatively fixed compared to "yes" and "no" malpractice). ECON101, dude.

And your comparison to car insurance makes zero sense, because the driver has nothing to do with setting the retail price of the car (beyond marketing influences). Logic. Fail.


so the car insurance analogy is pretty apt, since almost all states require the driver to carry it. i'm sure there are doctors who set their own prices out there, but for the most part the prices are set by the hospitals and HMOs, etc. i don't personally know any doctors, but the ones i've gone to don't set their own prices when i've asked them. their prices are set by the group they belong to.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan - 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM 967 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts - 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM 688 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped..... - 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM 690 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM 693 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM 861 Views
From a government employee: Nice post *NM* - 29/09/2009 10:17:48 PM 308 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM 631 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM 747 Views
the difference is the focus of the organizations - 29/09/2009 11:44:56 PM 751 Views
Re: the difference is the focus of the organizations - 30/09/2009 12:40:38 AM 760 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM 746 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM 724 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM* - 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM 296 Views
That's indisbutable - 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM 731 Views
And that's all I'm saying - 30/09/2009 07:08:04 PM 674 Views
Re: And that's all I'm saying - 01/10/2009 03:10:02 AM 722 Views
It doesn't work at all - 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM 763 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care - 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM 769 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice - 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM 645 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance - 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM 695 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes. - 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM 632 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health - 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM 791 Views
Yes, it's comforting to see that we are only rated 37th... - 29/09/2009 11:14:33 PM 663 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation - 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM 849 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people - 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM 659 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references - 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM 665 Views
i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM 728 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM 781 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM 807 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM 779 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM 741 Views
Interesting... - 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM 673 Views
So basically you are saying? - 01/10/2009 01:10:22 AM 616 Views
Basically... - 01/10/2009 02:52:51 AM 661 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM* - 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM 302 Views
yes, heaven forbid we take care of our own *NM* - 30/09/2009 04:13:50 PM 301 Views
looks l;ike they found some bipartisan spirit after all - 29/09/2009 10:35:55 PM 656 Views
Definitely wouldn't want to "denigrate" Health Care... - 30/09/2009 02:46:19 PM 633 Views

Reply to Message