Active Users:1079 Time:23/10/2026 07:02:59 PM
Uh, not quite... HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM
Contrary to what you may believe, we actually NEED CO2 in our atmosphere. Remove the CO2 and all the plants (you know, those green things that use sunlight and convert CO2 into oxygen through a process called photosynthesis) die. Shortly after the plants are gone, so are we.

Atmospheric CO2 content is a red herring.
Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1526 Views
This could mean great news for me personally - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 1212 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 1186 Views
Uh, not quite... - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 1018 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 620 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 1300 Views
aplogies - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 1091 Views
No problem *NM* - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 520 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 1032 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 1128 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 1066 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 1017 Views
Interesting. - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 1064 Views
Probably too little, too late. - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 1148 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 1075 Views
Nope. - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 1052 Views

Reply to Message