Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM
The carbon in coal is locked beneath the ground. When we bring it up and burn it, the CO2 that is generated is now added to the atmosphere. Even if you inject it into plants, when those plants die and decay the levels of CO2 will go up.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World!
- 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM
1010 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels?
- 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM
727 Views
Uh, not quite...
- 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM
595 Views
But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago
- 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM
801 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector
- 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM
778 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2.
- 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM
595 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2
- 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM
687 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon.
- 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM
607 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods.
- 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM
616 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM*
- 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM
288 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of
- 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM
585 Views
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind.
- 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM
609 Views
Probably too little, too late.
- 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM
679 Views