But where 'long history' is concerned, everyone has a history of abusing virtually everyone else. If ever someone needs a proof of the evils of capitalism, they need only recall the robber barons, or sweatshops, or many other cases. However, running parallel to them, or far worse, the whole time, has been the various governments. Both also have a history of doing good things, and a history of basically being mediocre. If an individual industry is rotten, then yes, the government is a route to fixing it, but better through regulation than seizing control of the industry though what is essentially a blatant power grab. Laws, yes, annexation, no.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
895 Views
- 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
895 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
- 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
613 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
- 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
622 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
- 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
716 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
621 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
- 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
792 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
560 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
680 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
- 29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
720 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
267 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
670 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
- 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
655 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
- 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
260 Views
That's indisbutable
- 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
647 Views
It doesn't work at all
- 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
684 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
- 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
700 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
- 30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
684 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
- 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
547 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
- 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
609 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
- 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
560 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
- 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
674 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
- 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
769 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
- 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
587 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
- 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
593 Views
i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
654 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
701 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
715 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
708 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
- 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
665 Views
Interesting...
- 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
596 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
- 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
261 Views

*NM*
*NM*