But where 'long history' is concerned, everyone has a history of abusing virtually everyone else. If ever someone needs a proof of the evils of capitalism, they need only recall the robber barons, or sweatshops, or many other cases. However, running parallel to them, or far worse, the whole time, has been the various governments. Both also have a history of doing good things, and a history of basically being mediocre. If an individual industry is rotten, then yes, the government is a route to fixing it, but better through regulation than seizing control of the industry though what is essentially a blatant power grab. Laws, yes, annexation, no.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
- 856 Views

I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
- 569 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
- 575 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
- 657 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
- 574 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
- 747 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
- 516 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
- 627 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
- 645 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
- 240 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
- 625 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
- 609 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
- 235 Views
That's indisbutable
30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
- 597 Views
It doesn't work at all
30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
- 630 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
- 641 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
- 621 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
- 498 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
- 565 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
- 518 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
- 626 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
- 717 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
- 538 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
- 547 Views
i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
- 593 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
- 655 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
- 635 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
- 648 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
- 613 Views
Interesting...
01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
- 532 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
- 237 Views