View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'

Just to be clear...
20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM
- 1203 Views
Of course it is
20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM
- 599 Views
But, they is us
23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM
- 772 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it
23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM
- 811 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet
20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM
- 720 Views
Well played
23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
- 860 Views

No you really can't
23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM
- 766 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM*
26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM
- 307 Views
How so? It made sense to me
26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM
- 606 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution.
26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM
- 640 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind
26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM
- 845 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
- 670 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM*
21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM
- 373 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal.
21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM
- 829 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution
22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM
- 629 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM
- 722 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM
- 721 Views
Yep
23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM
- 833 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness
23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM
- 695 Views
You're smarter than this
23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM
- 614 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well
24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM
- 726 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play
24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM
- 678 Views
And that reply makes my point
26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM
- 751 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction.
27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM
- 773 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it
22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM
- 704 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
- 264 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens?
23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM
- 738 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing
04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM
- 866 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points
04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM
- 4920 Views