Active Users:514 Time:13/11/2025 05:43:40 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM

View original post
Our Constitution has a basis in the presumption of innocence. Requiring background checks, before utalizing a Right that the Constitution states "shall not be infringed" reverses that presumption.

---
I understand WHY folks might be inclined to favor such a restriction, but it is against the plain language of our Constitution.


(Bolding mine)

The "plain language" of the amendment itself begins with, A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state... How do you personally reconcile that bit with the bit you quoted?

If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
Just to be clear... wooly - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1255 Views
Of course it is A Deathwatch Guard - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 649 Views
But, they is us wooly - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 821 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it A Deathwatch Guard - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 867 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet HyogaRott - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 777 Views
ROFL *NM* Isaac - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 329 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* Anonymous2000 - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 319 Views
Well played wooly - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 913 Views
No you really can't HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 818 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 328 Views
How so? It made sense to me Isaac - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 651 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 696 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind Isaac - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 894 Views
So is your post. Ghavrel - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 683 Views
I'm not sure how Isaac - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 723 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. Sareitha Sedai - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 723 Views
yes *NM* Roland00 - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 401 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* Dan - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 396 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. random thoughts - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 884 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution moondog - 22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM 680 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM 775 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM 770 Views
Yep wooly - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 889 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 749 Views
You're smarter than this wooly - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 665 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well random thoughts - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 779 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play HyogaRott - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 733 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 797 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 802 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction. HyogaRott - 27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM 824 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it moondog - 22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM 757 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* HyogaRott - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 285 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? wooly - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 795 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 679 Views
As you know nossy - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 754 Views
Why yes, yes I do... HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 814 Views
I agree nossy - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 879 Views
Re: I agree Isaac - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 786 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing imlad - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 925 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points Isaac - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4975 Views
That's not true at all. nossy - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 659 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? Isaac - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 765 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes