Active Users:441 Time:17/06/2025 03:30:33 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM

View original post
Our Constitution has a basis in the presumption of innocence. Requiring background checks, before utalizing a Right that the Constitution states "shall not be infringed" reverses that presumption.

---
I understand WHY folks might be inclined to favor such a restriction, but it is against the plain language of our Constitution.


(Bolding mine)

The "plain language" of the amendment itself begins with, A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state... How do you personally reconcile that bit with the bit you quoted?

If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
Just to be clear... wooly - 20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM 1203 Views
Of course it is A Deathwatch Guard - 20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM 600 Views
But, they is us wooly - 23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM 773 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it A Deathwatch Guard - 23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM 813 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet HyogaRott - 20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM 723 Views
ROFL *NM* Isaac - 20/04/2013 05:21:11 AM 309 Views
Bazinga! Well done..... *NM* Anonymous2000 - 21/04/2013 03:24:34 PM 299 Views
Well played wooly - 23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM 860 Views
No you really can't HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM 766 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM 307 Views
How so? It made sense to me Isaac - 26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM 606 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution. Ghavrel - 26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM 641 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind Isaac - 26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM 847 Views
So is your post. Ghavrel - 28/04/2013 08:41:16 AM 627 Views
I'm not sure how Isaac - 28/04/2013 02:46:00 PM 658 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious. Sareitha Sedai - 29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM 671 Views
yes *NM* Roland00 - 20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM 381 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM* Dan - 21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM 373 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal. random thoughts - 21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM 832 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution moondog - 22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM 630 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM 723 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM 722 Views
Yep wooly - 23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM 833 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM 698 Views
You're smarter than this wooly - 23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM 614 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well random thoughts - 24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM 726 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play HyogaRott - 24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM 680 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 743 Views
And that reply makes my point random thoughts - 26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM 751 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction. HyogaRott - 27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM 774 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it moondog - 22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM 705 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM* HyogaRott - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM 264 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens? wooly - 23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM 738 Views
freedom os speech can be a dangerous thing random thoughts - 23/04/2013 04:58:02 AM 624 Views
As you know nossy - 28/04/2013 12:11:04 PM 705 Views
Why yes, yes I do... HyogaRott - 23/04/2013 05:43:29 PM 759 Views
I agree nossy - 28/04/2013 12:55:13 PM 826 Views
Re: I agree Isaac - 05/05/2013 11:24:37 AM 723 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing imlad - 04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM 867 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points Isaac - 04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM 4921 Views
That's not true at all. nossy - 05/05/2013 09:45:17 AM 603 Views
*I* have a complex about dead threads? Isaac - 05/05/2013 10:36:15 AM 722 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes