Active Users:185 Time:19/05/2024 07:33:32 PM
Well, who would you vote for? The "real conservatives" in 2012 were terrible. Tom Send a noteboard - 09/05/2013 05:37:49 PM

Rick "Whiney" Santorum? Michelle "Batshit Crazy" Bachmann? Gingrich was the only one approaching normalcy, and that's saying a lot.

Or do you think Rubio or Ryan are going to run and stand a chance of winning? I think Ryan is somewhat compromised by his VP candidacy with Romney. Rubio might win, but I'm not sure he's ready to be a Presidential candidate. Jeb Bush would be great, but you have to worry about the Bush name.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Chris Christie 2016! - 08/05/2013 12:15:18 AM 775 Views
Obama has been terrible. He's not a socialist, he's an ineptocrat. - 08/05/2013 04:55:00 PM 379 Views
Good complaints, yet he is so much better than Bush *NM* - 09/05/2013 03:14:58 AM 262 Views
No, he just has better PR. *NM* - 10/05/2013 03:24:15 PM 131 Views
I like Christie but I wouldn't vote for him in a primary - 08/05/2013 09:36:09 PM 430 Views
Well, who would you vote for? The "real conservatives" in 2012 were terrible. - 09/05/2013 05:37:49 PM 367 Views
I favored Pawlenty and Daniels, I don't really have any for 2016 - 09/05/2013 11:57:34 PM 362 Views
I can't decide - 08/05/2013 11:11:07 PM 368 Views
No one denies the Spider issue is tricky and nuanced - 09/05/2013 02:28:35 AM 464 Views
You're missing her nuance entirely, though - 09/05/2013 05:39:25 PM 365 Views
I'd high-five you - 09/05/2013 07:34:37 PM 340 Views

Reply to Message