Active Users:186 Time:19/05/2024 09:45:52 PM
I favored Pawlenty and Daniels, I don't really have any for 2016 Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/05/2013 11:57:34 PM

View original postRick "Whiney" Santorum? Michelle "Batshit Crazy" Bachmann? Gingrich was the only one approaching normalcy, and that's saying a lot.

I never planned to vote for any of them, though I like Gingrich, he's a good talker and big thinker. No, I had wanted Daniels to get in then I flipped to Pawlenty when he didn't and reluctantly embraced Romney afterward, not that I don't like Romney, I do, whereas I didn't like McCain.


View original postOr do you think Rubio or Ryan are going to run and stand a chance of winning? I think Ryan is somewhat compromised by his VP candidacy with Romney. Rubio might win, but I'm not sure he's ready to be a Presidential candidate. Jeb Bush would be great, but you have to worry about the Bush name.

I'd vote any of them over Christie, not that I don't like Christie, but the tea leaves right now seem to pointing strongly at Ted Cruz. He's definitely running, I've known that since August of last year and there have been rumblings about it. I would back Paul Ryan, I like him, big thinker, good man, but I don't see him running. I'd like to see a midwestern governor like Kasich, Walker, Snyder, Brandstad or Pence to run but I don't see any of them going for it.

If Christie wants my primary vote, he needs convince me that he actually has a specific, solid political platform, it doesn't have to be hardcore conservative, that's a mostly subjective term anyway, I just need to be sure he's not a bullhorn mounted on a weathervane, and I've got my doubts. They don't really need to convince if they win a primary though, I'd vote for any of them probably regardless of the Dem Nominee, which I do not think will be Biden or Clinton, and a lot of who I'd favor would depend on who picks up that nomination. If it is Hillary, well I don't think she's unassailable but she'd have a big advantage going in, and similarly I don't think Biden would have much of a chance. The whole game is going to get shaken up by 2014 and everything that happens between now and 2016, but I think the Dems are going to have a harder time selecting right now, and we need a nominee who contrasts with theirs. Besides Clinton or Biden the only name I've heard seriously floated is Cuomo, and I don't think he'd be a very strong contender, more than Biden but less than Hillary.

As to Jeb Bush, yeah he'd work for me, smart guy, solidly conservative but not frothing about it like Santorum or Bachmann, I don't think the Bush name will hurt him too much by 2016, but that's hard to say.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 09/05/2013 at 11:59:47 PM
Reply to message
Chris Christie 2016! - 08/05/2013 12:15:18 AM 775 Views
Obama has been terrible. He's not a socialist, he's an ineptocrat. - 08/05/2013 04:55:00 PM 379 Views
Good complaints, yet he is so much better than Bush *NM* - 09/05/2013 03:14:58 AM 262 Views
No, he just has better PR. *NM* - 10/05/2013 03:24:15 PM 131 Views
I like Christie but I wouldn't vote for him in a primary - 08/05/2013 09:36:09 PM 431 Views
Well, who would you vote for? The "real conservatives" in 2012 were terrible. - 09/05/2013 05:37:49 PM 367 Views
I favored Pawlenty and Daniels, I don't really have any for 2016 - 09/05/2013 11:57:34 PM 363 Views
I can't decide - 08/05/2013 11:11:07 PM 369 Views
No one denies the Spider issue is tricky and nuanced - 09/05/2013 02:28:35 AM 465 Views
You're missing her nuance entirely, though - 09/05/2013 05:39:25 PM 365 Views
I'd high-five you - 09/05/2013 07:34:37 PM 340 Views

Reply to Message