If we are going to drop bombs it needs to be for affect. It doesn’t really matter if it changes the outcome of the civil war but if we are going to do it we need to launch a sustained strike against his military that does sign cant damage and makes the next despot reconsider using chemical agents to keep the peasants in line or we need to stay out and do nothing militarily at all. We don’t need to get involved in civil war where we really don’t like either side and we don’t want drop bombs to save face.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1171 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
720 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
694 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
690 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
733 Views
I am not a fan of symbolic bombing
- 30/08/2013 12:52:01 PM
704 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
644 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
620 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
805 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
631 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
851 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
783 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
640 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
687 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
657 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
269 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
781 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
713 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
741 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
773 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
773 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
787 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
603 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
617 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
634 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
710 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
653 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
585 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
689 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
726 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
643 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
661 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
625 Views