If we are going to drop bombs it needs to be for affect. It doesn’t really matter if it changes the outcome of the civil war but if we are going to do it we need to launch a sustained strike against his military that does sign cant damage and makes the next despot reconsider using chemical agents to keep the peasants in line or we need to stay out and do nothing militarily at all. We don’t need to get involved in civil war where we really don’t like either side and we don’t want drop bombs to save face.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1300 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
858 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
836 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
807 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
841 Views
I am not a fan of symbolic bombing
- 30/08/2013 12:52:01 PM
861 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
760 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
732 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
938 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
789 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
978 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
902 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
772 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
814 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
806 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
316 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
906 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
851 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
867 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
895 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
895 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
919 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
727 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
732 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
771 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
841 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
763 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
733 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
815 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
858 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
753 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
791 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
739 Views