View original postIt's a fascinating proposition.
View original postDo the crimes have to be actually against some sort of law? Are we limiting this to our local laws, any law anywhere, or just the laws of the country we are in? Are we counting misdemeanor crimes or all felonies? What about things that are morally ambiguous, like men wearing hats indoors? Or other things that should be crimes IE: talking in the theater? What about crimes they barely bother to prosecute?
Probably any of those, since we can stretch it to 'behavior which offends', though the original case was things that tie up police time. It doesn't need to be a local law, in fact I'd rather imagine a lot of ports and tourists traps suffer from visitors who either shrug off a local one as a stupid law or a normally minor law that has a nasty cumulative effect locally, like a memorial with harsh rules about stomping on around the grass.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Compelling Arguments
- 02/12/2013 12:03:23 PM
868 Views
Hmm, interesting.
- 04/12/2013 09:22:06 PM
476 Views
Re: Hmm, interesting.
- 05/12/2013 12:11:35 AM
457 Views
Is it really that hard to find compelling arguments against (hard) drug use?
- 05/12/2013 09:45:22 PM
425 Views