Active Users:311 Time:04/05/2024 12:51:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Well, perhaps. jh Send a noteboard - 13/01/2014 05:00:46 PM

View original post - everyone must be in the office by 9:00am (used to be much more flexible)

That's not really anything to be upset about... it kinda sucks, but whatever, perfectly within the rights of the employer


View original post - cannot take more than 10 consecutive business days for vacation (I've taken 12 before, and it was just fine; group runs smoothly and we cover for each other well)

Why would they want to impose a strict limit there? I don't understand it, shouldn't it at least be negotiable? Of course legal minimum for consecutive days during summer here is three weeks, so I have never experienced anything like this...


View original postA bunch of additional little (petty) things were also codified and written up as policy:


View original post - leaving earlier than 2pm will count as a 1/2 vacation day

Well, if you only work half a day?


View original post - at least a week's notice is required if to take more than 1 vacation/personal day

Not unreasonable at all. Depending on the type of work, of course, if someone needs to cover for you, those conditions are fairly soft...

"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Tell me if I'm overreacting or not to these vacation policy changes Aeryn - 12/01/2014 04:17:28 PM 898 Views
Yes, they are reasonable. Palatine - 12/01/2014 04:42:57 PM 937 Views
This stuff made me miss working in a company with an HR department Aeryn - 12/01/2014 06:44:22 PM 609 Views
I personally find HR departments a waste (but that's another issue). Palatine - 13/01/2014 04:41:29 PM 829 Views
They would be reasonable if you were an idiot in a nanny state type job. Tom - 12/01/2014 07:28:41 PM 656 Views
Re: They would be reasonable if you were an idiot in a nanny state type job. Aeryn - 13/01/2014 07:54:28 PM 590 Views
I think a lot depends on what's going on with personnel issues. Cannoli - 13/01/2014 04:26:04 AM 762 Views
You hit the nail on the head Aeryn - 13/01/2014 05:39:46 PM 716 Views
Honestly, they sound pretty reasonable. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 13/01/2014 04:30:58 AM 233 Views
You're not overreacting. Sareitha Sedai - 13/01/2014 03:00:02 PM 630 Views
flexibility should be a two way street random thoughts - 13/01/2014 04:22:24 PM 524 Views
Yep, pretty restrictive. That just shows once again that money isn't everything ironclad - 13/01/2014 04:27:39 PM 641 Views
I wish they asked... Aeryn - 13/01/2014 07:54:58 PM 583 Views
Aren't you kind of in the wrong line of work for that? *NM* Legolas - 13/01/2014 08:07:40 PM 229 Views
Well, perhaps. jh - 13/01/2014 05:00:46 PM 567 Views
A lot does indeed depend on the reason for the changes. Legolas - 13/01/2014 08:28:23 PM 650 Views
Please correct me if I am incorrect, but don't you work in finance or a related field? Stephen - 14/01/2014 11:45:15 PM 610 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes