Active Users:1237 Time:16/12/2025 09:47:17 PM
Re: Have you considered Nate Send a noteboard - 05/08/2014 05:06:25 AM

View original post
That the weight of the city and/or clock (depending on whether whatever jiggerypokery you've got going on affect it's weight on the ground as well as on itself) is likely to crush the earth around it into a huge depression? Could affect how far away it's visible.

Yep, it's foundation is not actually connected to the ground around it, it's buried deep in the earth, so I think I'm okay. For the size, your calculator agrees with what I've come up with, around 0.7 degrees. Since the full moon is 0.5 degrees, that's actually larger than it sounds. When I first saw 0.7 degrees as the answer I despaired, but after learning how that compares to the moon it all worked out.

As for the height to be seen above the horizon, that's some handy information. My world ... well, it sidesteps the curvature problem, I'll say.

Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Maths! And whether or not I am applying them correctly to a ridiculous fantasy situation. - 01/08/2014 06:39:38 PM 990 Views
You didn't even spell it right. - 01/08/2014 07:38:12 PM 739 Views
I have no idea what you mean. - 01/08/2014 07:55:22 PM 881 Views
I suspect - 04/08/2014 03:42:34 PM 715 Views
Pff. - 06/08/2014 06:27:10 PM 844 Views
There's a simple way of testing that, I figure. - 01/08/2014 11:05:38 PM 786 Views
Re: There's a simple way of testing that, I figure. - 01/08/2014 11:38:28 PM 974 Views
What size is the planet itself ? - 02/08/2014 11:21:40 AM 728 Views
Re: What size is the planet itself ? - 05/08/2014 05:01:37 AM 927 Views
I come bearing gifts of knowledge - 02/08/2014 07:54:07 PM 1155 Views
Have you considered - 02/08/2014 08:00:44 PM 965 Views
Re: Have you considered - 05/08/2014 05:06:25 AM 946 Views
See, I think you are doing this the wrong way around... - 04/08/2014 09:43:05 PM 761 Views
That's exactly what worried me. - 05/08/2014 05:11:51 AM 816 Views

Reply to Message