Active Users:910 Time:14/09/2025 02:23:29 PM
So what you have implied here then is that The Shrike Send a noteboard - 05/12/2014 04:05:10 PM

View original post
View original post
Well, yes, it is all about proportions.

Blacks killed by police: 123 = 27.4% of those killed
Whites killed by police: 326 = 72.6% of those killed


According to FBI stats:

"69.3 percent of all individuals arrested were white, 28.1 percent were black, and 2.6 percent were of other races."

So, it looks like there is a very close correlation between how much your "group" has crime-related contact with the police and you being killed by them.

Are police "overkilling" people? Probably. Does it look related to race, at least from THESE stats? No.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

Around about 13-14% of the US population is black. The stats you show above mean that black people are both arrested (28.1%), and killed by police (27.4%), about twice as often as white people.

Comparing the actual numbers against each other is meaningless unless you take them as a proportion of total population.


Though only making up 13 percent of the population, they commit more than twice as many arrest-worthy crimes.

Reply to message
New York cop pushes black man's face into pavement and chokes him to death for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 12:03:54 AM 1351 Views
What does his color have to do with anything? - 04/12/2014 07:37:08 AM 865 Views
A short answer for your long post - 04/12/2014 04:43:12 PM 727 Views
123 blacks shot to death by cops in 2012; 326 whites. - 05/12/2014 12:40:56 AM 833 Views
These numbers make me angry. - 05/12/2014 05:39:26 AM 716 Views
I hate these stats, so misleading. Only 13% of the US population is black! - 05/12/2014 02:02:18 PM 898 Views
"Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 02:28:23 PM 670 Views
math is hard - 05/12/2014 02:45:08 PM 767 Views
It doesn't matter why. - 05/12/2014 03:19:54 PM 902 Views
it does to me. - 05/12/2014 03:52:01 PM 713 Views
Dangerous territories when you talk socioeconomics - 05/12/2014 04:08:57 PM 672 Views
Danger is my middle name. *NM* - 05/12/2014 04:47:23 PM 377 Views
But that's a completely separate issue than the one that the post is talking about. - 05/12/2014 05:12:44 PM 844 Views
Heh, yes. Because none of us ever adds layers to these posts. Ever. - 05/12/2014 07:34:04 PM 749 Views
That is SUCH A BAD SENTENCE. - 05/12/2014 08:07:18 PM 731 Views
I'm not Tom - 05/12/2014 10:13:43 PM 671 Views
Thus spake Patsy Stone! - 05/12/2014 10:15:44 PM 688 Views
Sweetie Darling - 05/12/2014 10:16:34 PM 575 Views
Okay. I can agree that we do go on tangents. - 05/12/2014 10:23:21 PM 994 Views
Re: "Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 03:34:16 PM 933 Views
So what you have implied here then is that - 05/12/2014 04:05:10 PM 728 Views
That's a fair assumption to make *shrug* *NM* - 07/12/2014 05:35:59 PM 486 Views
And now you're the one doing exactly what you implied Cannoli was doing. - 05/12/2014 05:17:25 PM 641 Views
...I'm doing no such thing. - 07/12/2014 05:27:13 PM 819 Views
L-Dog is right, you are wrong, look at the proportion of crimes committed..... - 05/12/2014 06:30:29 PM 721 Views
Erm, no. - 07/12/2014 05:34:38 PM 922 Views
Unbelievable. I have no words... *NM* - 04/12/2014 10:15:32 AM 577 Views
he was not choked to death and he was not choked for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 02:28:44 PM 668 Views
I mean, "Killed him without intent" is pretty much the definition of manslaughter, isn't it? *NM* - 04/12/2014 04:44:18 PM 391 Views
sorry but it isn't - 04/12/2014 05:54:27 PM 645 Views
did you actually watch the video of his death? - 04/12/2014 06:30:26 PM 720 Views
OK watched it all the way. Which one of my conclusions were suppossed to change? - 04/12/2014 07:39:07 PM 586 Views
sorry, i mistook you for a human capable of compassion. my mistake - 04/12/2014 07:47:35 PM 614 Views
Don't worry I don't mistaake you for someone capable of rational thought - 04/12/2014 10:56:44 PM 609 Views

Reply to Message