Active Users:172 Time:18/06/2024 09:14:31 PM
More moondog illiteracy... Cannoli Send a noteboard - 30/06/2016 02:13:03 AM

View original post
i'd like to thank the House GOP for wasting two years and at least $7 million in taxpayer money to basically determine that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong and that we've already learned the important lessons about how to protect our overseas diplomats. good job, guys!

First of all, the article basically points out that the report DOES support attacks on Clinton:

The document cites an August 2011 memo in which Jake Sullivan, Clinton’s then-deputy chief of staff, said she has had “leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country’s Libya policy from start to finish.”

Clinton “has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group meetings—as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya,” Sullivan bragged. “She was instrumental in securing the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around [Muammar] Gadhafi and his regime.”

And, of course, to go with your typically illiteracy in linking to articles that do not remotely state what you claim they do, we have the hypocrisy of your complaints about $7 million. How much did the Democrats spend on Iran-Contra, or the Valerie Plame bullshit? $7 million is negligible on the scale of nonsense on which the government spends money, and you're an enthusiastic proponent of most of the sort of garbage they do spend it on.

And finally, typical left-wing strawman arguments. The point of the hearings was to investigate the incident, not to determine Hillary Clinton's character. If it HAD been an investigation of Clinton, and turned up nothing, that would STILL not make it a waste, because it would have clarified and firmly established her innocence. But it was an investigation of the entire incident, and did NOT produce the conclusion you claim. And it did turn up the e-mail thing ( "the probe exposed Clinton’s use as Secretary of State of a private server for her email..." ), which a blatantly partisan Democratic party and 90%-democrat-voting media has chosen to downplay and ignore.

Remember back when the attack actually happened, and you guys were all complaining that the GOP was making a stink about nothing just to smear Obama? Now you claim that the whole point of the Benghazi scandal was to smear Hillary. Make up your mind what imaginary agendas you are going to attribute to your targets.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
"How Republicans blew their chance to attack Clinton over Benghazi" - 29/06/2016 07:10:36 PM 760 Views
This crap always makes me laugh. - 29/06/2016 09:47:27 PM 400 Views
Re: This crap always makes me laugh. - 29/06/2016 11:33:57 PM 285 Views
Re: This crap always makes me laugh. - 01/07/2016 08:09:18 PM 351 Views
you're gonna have to find a non-propaganda version of your argument - 05/07/2016 09:17:44 PM 342 Views
"Propaganda" - 05/07/2016 11:30:47 PM 333 Views
Your speaking privileged have been revoked. - 30/06/2016 11:28:51 AM 302 Views
Typical liberal BS; when losing an argument on one topic, swap to another and claim to be right. *NM* - 01/07/2016 04:30:45 PM 168 Views
No it has nothing to do with liberal bs - 01/07/2016 05:24:42 PM 333 Views
Ok, I was wrong. - 01/07/2016 07:49:18 PM 333 Views
I 100% agree and I agree with your other points. - 01/07/2016 08:01:05 PM 337 Views
For the record... - 01/07/2016 08:15:20 PM 288 Views
Nods in agreement *NM* - 01/07/2016 08:22:31 PM 199 Views
far left journalist writes facrt free op ed YAWN - 30/06/2016 12:15:10 AM 242 Views
More moondog illiteracy... - 30/06/2016 02:13:03 AM 333 Views
ah, republicans good, dems bad -- as usual - 30/06/2016 09:38:28 PM 253 Views
Oh the irony *NM* - 01/07/2016 07:39:31 PM 126 Views

Reply to Message