I did not "attack all liberals". I was pointing out the hypocrisy in whining about $7million being "wasted" on a tragedy, when $500 million was wasted on a pet project. Sure, great, the program itself pulled a profit. That doesn't mean the $500m loaned to a failing company was any less of a waste. Without that waste, the program would have been $500million more in the black.

I'm "hyper-partisan", yet you refuse to watch an interview, simply because it says Fox on it. Ok, right. Anyways...

... if you had watched the clip(though I knew you wouldn't), you would hear what Gowdy said the conclusion was; that the Administration's failure to act decisively led to the preventable deaths of two of the four casualties in Benghazi. Again, this investigation was not about Hillary Clinton. As Gowdy himself said, their focus was on administration and intelligence hiccups.

Literally the only people who believe this investigation was about Clinton are you and your ilk. Again, and I must emphasize this; you are making an American tragedy about your candidate That is an absolutely disgusting tactic, and horrendously hypocritical coming from people who accuse Republicans of politicizing issues.

Different times call for different measures. There were 3.2 million illegal immigrants in 1986, and 240 million citizens. In 2014, there were 11 million illegal immigrants, and 319 million citizens. So, in 1986, the amount of illegal immigrants equaled 1.3% of the population. In 2014, that number is nearly 3 times higher (3.4%). The economic drain caused by this tripling-in-relation to population is tremendous.

If you can't tell that different times call for different responses, well, that's your flaw, not mine.

You're not? If you were being held hostage, and said hostage-taker had just killed someone, would you not take his word that he'd kill you if you don't shut your face?

There's nothing stupid or naive about trying to protect yourself from a known threat. ISIS has shown in recent days its ability to either inspire or directly coordinate acts of violence around the world. (Orlando, Istanbul, Dhaka) If their reach is so extensive, is it really that hard to believe they might back up their threats?

As an aside, non-political, person-to-person here. I understand you have a different point of view than I do. I have no doubt we've been raised in very differing environments, etc. etc. Just understand, from your point of view, as naive as I seem to be, listening to the used-car salesman of the world, you seem equally, if not more, naive for not listening to the man with a gun to your head. You see ISIS as the salesman, I see ISIS as the gunman. Just understand this difference in PoV and what it means.

Oh hey, look, you're actually listening to some things I say. Nice to know.

This sounded like bullshit to me, so I spent a solid half-hour researching it. And, well, it turns out abortion injury statistics are hard as shit to pin down. Pro-choice websites say that abortion is perfectly safe and everyone should have one or three. Pro-life websites say that abortion will kill you worse than headbutting a moving train.

So, I compromised, and split the difference. With that difference, 5/100 abortions has some sort of complication, with 1/100 being considered "serious". Colonoscopies have a complication risk of 5/1000 considered "serious", which maths down to 1/200. Thus, you are wrong; abortions are still more dangerous than colonoscopies.

As for anti-abortionists not adopting children, well, I don't know where you leave, but here in the South, I see it all the time. There's 8 or 10 families in my church alone who have adopted 3+ children.

As for "why do I get to tell women what to do", well, I don't. And in fact, I'm not trying to. But in my opinion, based on biology and the study of genetics, the fetus is no longer her body. It is not genetically her body, and biologically it is and will continue to develop into a human being. So do I have a problem what women do with their bodies? Naw, take those contraceptives, make him wear a rubber, cover yourself in aluminum foil and call yourself a robot. I don't care.

But do I have a problem when women kill a genetically distinct, biologically separate human, that they themselves helped to create through their own stupidity or laziness? Yes, yes I do.

Do I have a problem with them killing a genetically distinct, biologically separate human, which was forced upon them? No. So don't accuse me of being some rape or incest apologist, because I am not.

As for your link, I read it(which is more than you do for me), and it is interesting. Were it my wife, yes, I would have kept her body alive until the child was viable. I mean, she was brain dead, so it's not like she was using her body anymore, or would be bothered by it being kept alive.

A government can't run out of money, huh? Wow, quick, tell Greece, I'm sure they'll appreciate knowing that!

Indeed, some debt is good, and can create growth. Hell, I understand that only roughly 30% of our debt is 'real', because the other roughly 70% is owned by entities or people within the United States. But 30% of $20 trillion is still roughly $7 trillion, and even paying that off would take years at this point. Deficit spending is not how to go forward.

And you're going to compare the American economy to... (looks again) haha you must be joking, Kansas? So you're telling me we can compare the United States, economic and technological center of the world, to a patch of dirt with no major exports aside from civilian aircraft parts and agricultural goods? (https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/state/data/ks.html)

Come on man, even you should be better than that. And don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Republican trickle down economics is the way to fix the economy. If you must know, I think that's about the worst possible way to do things. But, Democratic deficit spending is showing itself to be equally as bad.

I don't know the solution, but I'm damn sure you don't either, and I'm absolutely damn sure that Obama 2.0 (Clinton) won't be able to fix the problem by EVEN MORE deficit spending.