As in the case of Michael Brown and Eric Garner and every other petty crook about whose death you carried on and on, while having no first-hand knowledge of the events, as opposed to heavily documented white collar crimes. Except the police officers in question have not had the power or means to obstruct investigations or intimidate or buy off witnesses.
Benghazi was four years ago. Except, of course, you aren't talking about that, you are talking about a wide array of activities, in every facet of the woman's life, that keep drawing the attention of law enforcement.

Congresses - people subject to political pressures, not a jury. Congress is not an investigative body, nor are they empowered to act as a jury. And in every case, she had a President of the US with a strong motivation to see her skate, and a history of his Justice Department abusing their authority for political purposes.

Liar.

Muslim isn't a race.

That's an actual motivation that has nothing to do with race. How does citing an unrelated motivation support charges of racism.

And all you could come up with were three items, two of which have nothing to do with race (and one of those by your own admission), and one of which you have repeatedly failed to demonstrate has any racist direction, only citing racial stereotypes in your efforts to claim it falls disproportionately on blacks.

Remember when "white supremacist" meant "people who advocated for legalized second class citizenship for blacks," instead of "people who support policies in their own self interest that Democrats do not like".

For that matter, where do you get off calling the opposition racist, when their own interests are so consistently harmed by your policies? If absolutely every liberal plank is against white or male interests, doesn't that sort of pattern suggest you are the racists?