Active Users:807 Time:28/08/2025 04:42:02 AM
In theory, I agree with you... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM

Her having classified info...and sending classified info...is fine. It was part of her job.

The problem was, if that information was stored/sent from a non-secure system, that is a problem. That goes back to protecting the integrity of secure information. Just a few weeks ago, we had a midshipman prosecuted and sentenced to a year in jail for taking a selfie at work, to send to his daughter (young, 6 or 7). He was standing in the engine room....secured information zone. There was no machinery behind him...just a wall with a sign that said "wear your ear protection". However he was in a secure information zone.

That picture, as innocent as it is, is putting him in jail for a year, and is going to have him discharged from the Navy. This is an honest mistake. No malice. No deceit. When asked about it, he fessed up.

You'll notice that isn't the case with H.Clinton. There wasn't malice. But there was certainly deceit.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 749 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 661 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 290 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 725 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 735 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 398 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 663 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 612 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 804 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 579 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 615 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 660 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 648 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 663 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 633 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 252 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 627 Views

Reply to Message