Active Users:393 Time:16/06/2025 09:30:55 PM
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? The Shrike Send a noteboard - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM

View original post
The liberals run on nothing but morality. The problem is their ideas for morality don't get past what feels good just like their ideas for advancing feminism stops at demanding they be treated like minorities and wearing vagina hats. My conservative wife who runs the local girl scout service unit and pushes leader ship and STEM has done more t advance women that all the twat hats combined.

But once again we are back to sheep logic. The left is allowed to wail and scream about morality even though they act immorally all the time and then claim they can do it because the conservatives believe in morality? That is some deep Kool-Aid sucking sheep thinking. If they don't support morality they need to stand up and own then they need to keep getting their panties wadded up about morality. The make Clinton, the Kennedys and Martin Luther icons of their movement then claim they offended by womanizers? Not even sheep should buy that.



If you're going to bring in Germanics from the 16th century, might I suggest you bring in Charles V instead?
This message last edited by The Shrike on 20/04/2017 at 05:24:01 PM
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 951 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 759 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 783 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 726 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 657 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 635 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 692 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 710 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 644 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 806 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 635 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 642 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 787 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 458 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 649 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 691 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 612 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 722 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 601 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 663 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 768 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 840 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 624 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 736 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 569 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 643 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 737 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 277 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 583 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 673 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 693 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 623 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 645 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 735 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 618 Views

Reply to Message