Active Users:1024 Time:04/08/2026 08:05:30 PM
Regarding corporate policy damookster Send a noteboard - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM

Technically you are absolutely right. One accused of sexual harassment is innocent until proven guilty. Unfortunately the reality of the situation, at least at any big corporation where I have worked, is that once one employee brings such a claim to HR against another, you can stick a fork in the accused. His or her career is done. Most companies lean heavily towards the accuser if for no other reason that to ensure they can't be included in any civil suit. Since most of these situations are he said/she said anyway, by favoring the accuser they head off the claim that the company fosters a hostile work environment.

Obviously if there are witnesses then that's different. But in a no witness scenario, even if the accused doesn't get fired, they will soon leave on their own. Unless they like no hope of ever having an upward career path.

I'm not speculating on this. I can give at least two examples, at different companies, that I have personally seen.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 1209 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 988 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 1020 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 949 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 878 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 853 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 908 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 914 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 884 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 1040 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 882 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 890 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 1024 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 555 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 908 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 917 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 862 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 939 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 818 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 883 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 997 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 1080 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 827 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 961 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 777 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 884 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 973 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 363 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 810 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 947 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 918 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 841 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 844 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 980 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 867 Views

Reply to Message