Active Users:173 Time:18/05/2024 07:50:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange Send a noteboard - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM
He said something I found very interesting. I wanted to see what some of you guys thought about it.

He argued that the prize being given was not really intended for Obama himself. He said he saw it as being given to the American voters through Obama for changing the direction of the most powerful nation on Earth. The rest of the world was so relieved, in his opinion, that they saw the election of Obama as an enormous step toward peace.

What do you think? Is he full of crap? Or might this hold some truth?
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 658 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 140 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? beetnemesis - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 374 Views
No. Ouranid - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 406 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* Legolas - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 144 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* jh - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 141 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* Jragghen - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 155 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* Craig - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 151 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 160 Views
maybe? *NM* temeraire - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 163 Views
I think your friend is right in part random thoughts - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 420 Views
From a CNN article: Aemon - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 395 Views
Re: From a CNN article: Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 379 Views
Mmmmnah Camilla - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 429 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 151 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 155 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* Joker - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 159 Views
I can't really agree nossy - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 380 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* everynametaken - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 129 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice Sidious - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 405 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* random thoughts - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 136 Views
Do you have a source for that? Sareitha Sedai - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 355 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 472 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. Sareitha Sedai - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 359 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 356 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 373 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money. Palatine - 13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM 389 Views
He promises change.... Mats imaginary friend - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 435 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes