Active Users:195 Time:18/05/2024 10:37:09 PM
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious Send a noteboard - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM

The other two candidates were Sarkozy and Tsvangirai. Sarkozy has seriously done nothing for peace, and Tsvangirai is a puppet for a still reigning tyrant.

There's no one who's contributed seriously to world peace in the past year, but of those three I'd also choose Obama.

I'd give out the Peace prize once every 5 or 10 years if I had a choice. From the trends, it seems that such exceptional human beings don't appear on an annual basis, and the award invariably cheapens due to poor availability of candidates.


So you can't tell me that there were no serious or deserving candidates - MSF, Red Cross, Amnesty International, Oxfam and many others are there even if nobody else is, and I'm sure there are many people who've been doing good work, even if it's in smaller countries that don't get much media attention. People have gotten the Nobel Prize in recent years for promoting the peace in Timor-Leste, in Guatemala, and other small countries; there's no reason why the committee has to pick someone famous or known worldwide.


I initially said they don't award groups, but I see they have in the past.

I have no problem with them awarding hardworking groups. The reaction, and the award, would remain as lukewarm as Obama's. No one's done anything groundbreaking. They're trying to find a great triumph of peace in a sea of mediocrity.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 14/10/2009 at 07:30:35 AM
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 658 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 140 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 375 Views
No. - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 406 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 145 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 141 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 156 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 151 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 161 Views
maybe? *NM* - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 164 Views
I think your friend is right in part - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 420 Views
From a CNN article: - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 396 Views
Re: From a CNN article: - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 379 Views
Mmmmnah - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 429 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 152 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 156 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 159 Views
I can't really agree - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 380 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 129 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 405 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 137 Views
Do you have a source for that? - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 355 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 472 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 360 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 356 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 374 Views
He promises change.... - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 437 Views

Reply to Message