Active Users:343 Time:08/09/2026 10:09:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
From a CNN article: Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM
"This is an encouragement to this president to continue to follow through on those commitments when, inevitably, he hits the bump in the road," said John King, CNN chief national correspondent .

"The committee is essentially saying, 'Stay at it, Mr. President. You have our prestige behind you now.' "

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This, to me, is the most likely reason he won. Has he done anything worthy of a peace prize? No. But he's talked up a lot of great intentions, and the committee is trying to bribe/guilt him into actually following through. I'm not sure this is entirely a bad use of the prize if it gets results, but I can't help but think that it cheapens it into little more than a political tool. In my opinion, a prize should be a recognition, not an incentive.
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 948 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 261 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? beetnemesis - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 660 Views
No. Ouranid - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 708 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* Legolas - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 265 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* jh - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 258 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* Jragghen - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 276 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* Craig - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 277 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 282 Views
maybe? *NM* temeraire - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 289 Views
I think your friend is right in part random thoughts - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 702 Views
From a CNN article: Aemon - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 682 Views
Re: From a CNN article: Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 662 Views
Mmmmnah Camilla - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 711 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 272 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 275 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* Joker - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 283 Views
I can't really agree nossy - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 667 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* everynametaken - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 253 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice Sidious - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 689 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* random thoughts - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 259 Views
Do you have a source for that? Sareitha Sedai - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 631 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 794 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. Sareitha Sedai - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 648 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 659 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 666 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money. Palatine - 13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM 695 Views
He promises change.... Mats imaginary friend - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 725 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes