Active Users:437 Time:17/06/2025 03:08:15 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
From a CNN article: Aemon Send a noteboard - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM
"This is an encouragement to this president to continue to follow through on those commitments when, inevitably, he hits the bump in the road," said John King, CNN chief national correspondent .

"The committee is essentially saying, 'Stay at it, Mr. President. You have our prestige behind you now.' "

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This, to me, is the most likely reason he won. Has he done anything worthy of a peace prize? No. But he's talked up a lot of great intentions, and the committee is trying to bribe/guilt him into actually following through. I'm not sure this is entirely a bad use of the prize if it gets results, but I can't help but think that it cheapens it into little more than a political tool. In my opinion, a prize should be a recognition, not an incentive.
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 792 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 193 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? beetnemesis - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 508 Views
No. Ouranid - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 539 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* Legolas - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 196 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* jh - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 188 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* Jragghen - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 207 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* Craig - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 202 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 215 Views
maybe? *NM* temeraire - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 216 Views
I think your friend is right in part random thoughts - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 552 Views
From a CNN article: Aemon - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 526 Views
Re: From a CNN article: Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 507 Views
Mmmmnah Camilla - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 565 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 203 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 203 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* Joker - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 215 Views
I can't really agree nossy - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 517 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* everynametaken - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 185 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice Sidious - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 543 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* random thoughts - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 186 Views
Do you have a source for that? Sareitha Sedai - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 490 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 627 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. Sareitha Sedai - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 495 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 489 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 507 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money. Palatine - 13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM 524 Views
He promises change.... Mats imaginary friend - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 573 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes