I really, really enjoyed this particular piece. I never knew this much space could be used to say "we are not allowed to tell you anything". I am not being snarky. I love it. It is beautiful. And it really does pique my curiosity.
That was the idea; to pique curiosity so people will find out what the hell they're not allowed to tell people about.
Well, of course. But it was beautifully done.
What is this Wikileaks site? Is it reliable?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Guardian gagged
- 13/10/2009 10:19:23 AM
1170 Views
The new "silly" one is quite excellent, thankyouverymuch 
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
364 Views
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
364 Views
And you do NOT replace David Morissey with Ben Affleck
- 13/10/2009 11:28:51 AM
755 Views
It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:39:22 AM
751 Views
Re: It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:52:16 AM
769 Views
This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 01:27:01 PM
745 Views
Re: This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 02:39:35 PM
753 Views
*NM*
Apparently....
- 13/10/2009 01:41:39 PM
765 Views
Fascinating
- 13/10/2009 02:40:58 PM
780 Views
The article itself is highly amusing. The content... somewhat disturbing actually.
- 13/10/2009 05:06:38 PM
784 Views
I'm very curious
- 13/10/2009 05:10:03 PM
1125 Views
The gag has been dropped. Also: write a freaking constitution already. *NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
383 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
383 Views
Don't really need one. There is an earlier rulin which makes this one problematic, I think?
- 14/10/2009 08:49:22 AM
750 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 12:16:17 AM
928 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 09:43:00 AM
710 Views