I really, really enjoyed this particular piece. I never knew this much space could be used to say "we are not allowed to tell you anything". I am not being snarky. I love it. It is beautiful. And it really does pique my curiosity.
That was the idea; to pique curiosity so people will find out what the hell they're not allowed to tell people about.
Well, of course. But it was beautifully done.
What is this Wikileaks site? Is it reliable?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Guardian gagged
- 13/10/2009 10:19:23 AM
1086 Views
The new "silly" one is quite excellent, thankyouverymuch 
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
326 Views
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
326 Views
And you do NOT replace David Morissey with Ben Affleck
- 13/10/2009 11:28:51 AM
677 Views
It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:39:22 AM
688 Views
Re: It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:52:16 AM
687 Views
This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 01:27:01 PM
670 Views
Re: This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 02:39:35 PM
684 Views
*NM*
Apparently....
- 13/10/2009 01:41:39 PM
698 Views
Fascinating
- 13/10/2009 02:40:58 PM
704 Views
The article itself is highly amusing. The content... somewhat disturbing actually.
- 13/10/2009 05:06:38 PM
701 Views
I'm very curious
- 13/10/2009 05:10:03 PM
1028 Views
The gag has been dropped. Also: write a freaking constitution already. *NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
335 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
335 Views
Don't really need one. There is an earlier rulin which makes this one problematic, I think?
- 14/10/2009 08:49:22 AM
671 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 12:16:17 AM
847 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 09:43:00 AM
635 Views