Active Users:1155 Time:06/11/2025 09:59:55 PM
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk nossy Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM
except that one of the specialists in animal virology has made the same claims.

Do you know who it was? Someone from your school?
Reply to message
Innoculation misinformation - 20/10/2009 04:14:58 PM 779 Views
I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:34:03 PM 393 Views
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM 372 Views
oh yah sorry i forgot those words even though i said them in my head - 20/10/2009 04:44:05 PM 372 Views
do you remember anything of what he said, specifically? - 20/10/2009 04:51:00 PM 377 Views
he wrote an article for our school newspaper - 20/10/2009 05:03:15 PM 359 Views
Excellent. - 20/10/2009 04:41:27 PM 352 Views
Their explanation on Thimerosol isn't really comforting. - 20/10/2009 04:57:22 PM 400 Views
I had the same thought. - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM 389 Views
*gasp* you mean you didn't DIE???? - 20/10/2009 05:04:15 PM 346 Views
<shrug> I'll be getting it regardless - 20/10/2009 06:25:52 PM 385 Views
not really that weird. - 20/10/2009 09:13:27 PM 363 Views
I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM 353 Views
Re: I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 01:08:50 AM 366 Views
In Sweden it does contain squalene - 20/10/2009 06:04:08 PM 653 Views
In the US, we're apparently not allowed to add it. - 20/10/2009 06:10:06 PM 400 Views

Reply to Message