Active Users:197 Time:18/05/2024 10:29:50 PM
I am not sure that is less dangerous... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM
The issue is whether any vaccine that contains known toxins (other than the virus itself, of course) should be administered. To my mind, the answer is that if the disease that is to be prevented is worse than the toxin, one should definitely still take the vaccine.

However, I have yet to see evidence that H1N1 is worse than the seasonal flu. In fact, all evidence is that it is milder than the typical seasonal flu. Furthermore, I believe that I and my family already have been exposed to the H1N1 flu back in late February of this year - the symptoms we had are identical to the H1N1 and my flu vaccination didn't stop it because it wasn't in the "cocktail" of vaccinations for last flu season (I only got vaccinated because my wife was pregnant).


Like any flu of course the old/young rule is going to apply. Those most likely to die are the old and the young, which is the main reason I did not get a vaccine. I have had the flue before and I've never come close to dying.
Still, I just saw on the news last night that almost double the amount of people that typically die from the flu through the calendar year have already died with several more months to go. I think it was CNN but it might have been local news I saw that on. This one does seem to be a real SOB for those who are most likely to get it.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Innoculation misinformation - 20/10/2009 04:14:58 PM 653 Views
I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:34:03 PM 300 Views
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM 273 Views
oh yah sorry i forgot those words even though i said them in my head - 20/10/2009 04:44:05 PM 273 Views
do you remember anything of what he said, specifically? - 20/10/2009 04:51:00 PM 256 Views
he wrote an article for our school newspaper - 20/10/2009 05:03:15 PM 264 Views
Excellent. - 20/10/2009 04:41:27 PM 247 Views
Their explanation on Thimerosol isn't really comforting. - 20/10/2009 04:57:22 PM 302 Views
I had the same thought. - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM 288 Views
*gasp* you mean you didn't DIE???? - 20/10/2009 05:04:15 PM 247 Views
<shrug> I'll be getting it regardless - 20/10/2009 06:25:52 PM 279 Views
not really that weird. - 20/10/2009 09:13:27 PM 269 Views
I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM 252 Views
Re: I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 01:08:50 AM 263 Views
In Sweden it does contain squalene - 20/10/2009 06:04:08 PM 507 Views
In the US, we're apparently not allowed to add it. - 20/10/2009 06:10:06 PM 299 Views

Reply to Message