Active Users:266 Time:25/05/2024 08:23:40 PM
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk nossy Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM
except that one of the specialists in animal virology has made the same claims.

Do you know who it was? Someone from your school?
Reply to message
Innoculation misinformation - 20/10/2009 04:14:58 PM 655 Views
I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:34:03 PM 301 Views
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM 274 Views
oh yah sorry i forgot those words even though i said them in my head - 20/10/2009 04:44:05 PM 274 Views
do you remember anything of what he said, specifically? - 20/10/2009 04:51:00 PM 256 Views
he wrote an article for our school newspaper - 20/10/2009 05:03:15 PM 264 Views
Excellent. - 20/10/2009 04:41:27 PM 247 Views
Their explanation on Thimerosol isn't really comforting. - 20/10/2009 04:57:22 PM 303 Views
I had the same thought. - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM 288 Views
*gasp* you mean you didn't DIE???? - 20/10/2009 05:04:15 PM 247 Views
<shrug> I'll be getting it regardless - 20/10/2009 06:25:52 PM 279 Views
not really that weird. - 20/10/2009 09:13:27 PM 270 Views
I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM 252 Views
Re: I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 01:08:50 AM 264 Views
In Sweden it does contain squalene - 20/10/2009 06:04:08 PM 509 Views
In the US, we're apparently not allowed to add it. - 20/10/2009 06:10:06 PM 301 Views

Reply to Message