It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
Stephen Send a noteboard - 22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
So who else is looking forward to it tonight?
If all goes well it will show the BNP up for what they really are, anyone object to them being on tonight?
I understand that lots of people in the US might not be familiar with Question Time and the BNP, so long story short:
Question Time is a topical debate television programme in the United Kingdom. The show typically features politicians from at least the three major political parties as well as other public figures (such as the odd comedia
If all goes well it will show the BNP up for what they really are, anyone object to them being on tonight?
I understand that lots of people in the US might not be familiar with Question Time and the BNP, so long story short:
Question Time is a topical debate television programme in the United Kingdom. The show typically features politicians from at least the three major political parties as well as other public figures (such as the odd comedia
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Question Time and the BNP
22/10/2009 07:29:34 PM
- 920 Views
I think you gain more letting them speak them trying to silience them
22/10/2009 07:58:52 PM
- 599 Views
They like ratings.
22/10/2009 08:22:59 PM
- 620 Views
It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
- 221 Views
I think it's a good call from the BBC, and I do intend to watch it.
22/10/2009 08:41:25 PM
- 494 Views
Sorry, we're 20 years behind the rest of Europe because we have a system that makes it hard...
22/10/2009 10:33:08 PM
- 518 Views
I rather liked (if I can be forgiven for sounding like a broken record) ...
22/10/2009 10:57:10 PM
- 739 Views
BNP membership list
22/10/2009 11:01:34 PM
- 659 Views
I find the leaking of that to be disturbing.
23/10/2009 01:38:09 PM
- 583 Views
That was really quite disappointing.
22/10/2009 11:42:58 PM
- 555 Views
I thought it was perfectly executed.
22/10/2009 11:58:18 PM
- 529 Views
That's why I said it'd have been much more interesting without him.
23/10/2009 12:33:57 AM
- 641 Views
I think it exposed him as an non-viable alternative
23/10/2009 12:54:57 AM
- 663 Views
You clearly watched a different programme to me. *NM*
23/10/2009 12:57:59 AM
- 273 Views
At which point did it show he was anywhere near capable of being a serious politician
23/10/2009 01:15:20 AM
- 506 Views
At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
- 676 Views
I think the Radio 1 interview a few weeks back did a better job of exposing their lunacy.
23/10/2009 01:06:19 AM
- 634 Views
Went about how I expected
23/10/2009 12:16:50 PM
- 622 Views
Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 01:22:56 PM
- 595 Views
Re: Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 02:14:50 PM
- 647 Views
I think we liked and disliked the same thing for the same reasons
23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
- 611 Views

I've already seen BBC interviews today out on the street
23/10/2009 02:14:13 PM
- 584 Views
It will be interesting to see any polls done, to see the actual impact.
23/10/2009 02:55:49 PM
- 595 Views