It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
Stephen Send a noteboard - 22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
So who else is looking forward to it tonight?
If all goes well it will show the BNP up for what they really are, anyone object to them being on tonight?
I understand that lots of people in the US might not be familiar with Question Time and the BNP, so long story short:
Question Time is a topical debate television programme in the United Kingdom. The show typically features politicians from at least the three major political parties as well as other public figures (such as the odd comedia
If all goes well it will show the BNP up for what they really are, anyone object to them being on tonight?
I understand that lots of people in the US might not be familiar with Question Time and the BNP, so long story short:
Question Time is a topical debate television programme in the United Kingdom. The show typically features politicians from at least the three major political parties as well as other public figures (such as the odd comedia
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Question Time and the BNP
22/10/2009 07:29:34 PM
- 781 Views
I think you gain more letting them speak them trying to silience them
22/10/2009 07:58:52 PM
- 440 Views
They like ratings.
22/10/2009 08:22:59 PM
- 475 Views
It's funny how equality means they have to let anti-equality groups on *NM*
22/10/2009 08:27:14 PM
- 162 Views
I think it's a good call from the BBC, and I do intend to watch it.
22/10/2009 08:41:25 PM
- 350 Views
Sorry, we're 20 years behind the rest of Europe because we have a system that makes it hard...
22/10/2009 10:33:08 PM
- 373 Views
I rather liked (if I can be forgiven for sounding like a broken record) ...
22/10/2009 10:57:10 PM
- 559 Views
BNP membership list
22/10/2009 11:01:34 PM
- 496 Views
I find the leaking of that to be disturbing.
23/10/2009 01:38:09 PM
- 435 Views
That was really quite disappointing.
22/10/2009 11:42:58 PM
- 388 Views
I thought it was perfectly executed.
22/10/2009 11:58:18 PM
- 384 Views
That's why I said it'd have been much more interesting without him.
23/10/2009 12:33:57 AM
- 485 Views
I think it exposed him as an non-viable alternative
23/10/2009 12:54:57 AM
- 530 Views
You clearly watched a different programme to me. *NM*
23/10/2009 12:57:59 AM
- 212 Views
At which point did it show he was anywhere near capable of being a serious politician
23/10/2009 01:15:20 AM
- 345 Views
At which point do you think any rational human being thought he was a serious politician?
23/10/2009 01:21:38 AM
- 535 Views
I think the Radio 1 interview a few weeks back did a better job of exposing their lunacy.
23/10/2009 01:06:19 AM
- 481 Views
Went about how I expected
23/10/2009 12:16:50 PM
- 489 Views
Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 01:22:56 PM
- 441 Views
Re: Pretty much my thoughts exactly
23/10/2009 02:14:50 PM
- 505 Views
I think we liked and disliked the same thing for the same reasons
23/10/2009 03:07:00 PM
- 461 Views
I've already seen BBC interviews today out on the street
23/10/2009 02:14:13 PM
- 434 Views
It will be interesting to see any polls done, to see the actual impact.
23/10/2009 02:55:49 PM
- 444 Views