Active Users:664 Time:18/08/2026 06:08:15 PM
Re: sure he can don't but lets not pretend he is not acting in his own self interest callandor1000 Send a noteboard - 06/11/2009 11:08:39 PM
which was the point of the articel.


No. The point of the article is to take credence from Al Gore (god, he doesn't have much left so why anyone would take the little he has is beyond me) by saying its wrong to invest his own, hard earned money into something that he firmly believes in which could likely gain him money (the point of investing). What is wrong with part of it being his own self interest? For one, that is what this damned country is built on.

Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.

My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
Reply to message
Even for AGW supporters, it's all about the other "green"..... - 03/11/2009 04:09:37 PM 913 Views
Wait... Where is the problem? I'm lost as to what is wrong here. - 03/11/2009 04:32:47 PM 608 Views
profits are fine when it it a private money - 03/11/2009 06:33:01 PM 614 Views
Re: profits are fine when it it a private money - 04/11/2009 10:33:28 PM 558 Views
It was his money he invested but the money he is making comes from the government - 05/11/2009 07:22:54 PM 589 Views
It does? I thought he was out of public office... that's what the article says. - 05/11/2009 09:55:33 PM 560 Views
sure he can don't but lets not pretend he is not acting in his own self interest - 06/11/2009 04:44:33 PM 573 Views
Re: sure he can don't but lets not pretend he is not acting in his own self interest - 06/11/2009 11:08:39 PM 565 Views
yeah... I'm with callandor. Are you saying that they're corrupt in some way? - 03/11/2009 04:44:10 PM 599 Views
Corrupt no, but biased and motivated to make sure the AGW "crisis" endures..... - 03/11/2009 04:50:48 PM 576 Views
I don't really believe in Global Warming. - 03/11/2009 04:59:26 PM 577 Views
agreement *NM* - 03/11/2009 05:10:04 PM 293 Views
Hi Celia! I talked to your man the other night. - 03/11/2009 05:14:51 PM 579 Views
You both are idiots. - 03/11/2009 05:35:57 PM 574 Views
Charming as ever..... *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:20:37 AM 290 Views
. *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:45:42 AM 284 Views
Re: You both are idiots. - 05/11/2009 06:22:00 PM 568 Views
why do you think we have only one source of energy? - 03/11/2009 06:35:23 PM 559 Views
Man invests in company that does business the way he wants them to. - 03/11/2009 05:30:24 PM 571 Views
a pushes government to spend a lot of money and then pockets a huge amount of it. Details at 9 *NM* - 03/11/2009 06:36:56 PM 314 Views
That's how lobbying works, yes... *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:49:44 AM 299 Views
You endorse lobbying for personal gain? - 04/11/2009 03:34:02 AM 566 Views
No. But I don't think he's lobbying for personal gain. - 04/11/2009 03:43:08 AM 592 Views
If his motives are so pure, then he shouldn't be in charge of his investments. - 04/11/2009 03:49:50 AM 535 Views
What makes you think I particularly care about Al Gore? - 04/11/2009 07:59:56 PM 565 Views
Isn't he the same guy who uses ten times as much energy as his neighbors - 04/11/2009 06:16:14 PM 592 Views
Maybe he is. - 04/11/2009 08:03:53 PM 544 Views
The only thing I reason I have a problem is it is public money - 05/11/2009 07:22:12 PM 568 Views
I don't see a problem here - 03/11/2009 06:29:46 PM 565 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:49:48 AM 295 Views
Sounds more like you're protesting efficiency ... *NM* - 04/11/2009 03:18:07 AM 287 Views
Change your words to "Cheney" and "Halliburton" if you want to see them all switch their replies. - 04/11/2009 03:29:32 AM 652 Views
Cheney didn't endorse petrochemical ideals before he was part of Halliburton, to my knowledge. - 04/11/2009 03:44:33 AM 571 Views
Of course you don't. - 04/11/2009 03:51:56 AM 559 Views
Never fear, Ghavrel. I agree with you. - 04/11/2009 01:41:00 PM 621 Views
And I. - 04/11/2009 02:14:07 PM 599 Views
If we must - 04/11/2009 02:53:04 PM 575 Views
See your noteboard. - 04/11/2009 04:59:20 PM 589 Views
to you knowledge did he oppose them? - 04/11/2009 06:19:16 PM 591 Views
You're not wrong at all. - 04/11/2009 07:56:25 PM 573 Views
Re: You're not wrong at all. - 05/11/2009 07:33:08 PM 572 Views
If my assumption seems highly reasonable? Then no, that's about right. - 06/11/2009 01:24:48 AM 553 Views
Cheney supported oil exploration before he ran Halliburton *NM* - 07/11/2009 06:39:33 AM 299 Views
Cool. Then his investment in that company isn't a problem. - 08/11/2009 01:00:14 AM 527 Views
Cheney was Vice-President. - 04/11/2009 02:44:55 PM 584 Views
Of course it isn't the exact same thing, but few analogies are. - 04/11/2009 05:16:34 PM 570 Views
It's a very different thing, even. - 04/11/2009 06:11:15 PM 577 Views
I don't believe anyone is saying he shouldn't be allowed to do it - 05/11/2009 07:41:14 PM 563 Views
And you choose to ignore my entire post, or what? - 05/11/2009 09:41:21 PM 545 Views
The Nobel committee seems to be rather found of him - 06/11/2009 04:43:10 PM 591 Views
Capitalist invests in companies who work towards the same cause as he does? Shocking. - 04/11/2009 03:12:52 PM 510 Views
Well - 04/11/2009 05:18:50 PM 586 Views
The US is a communist country. - 05/11/2009 09:59:16 PM 541 Views

Reply to Message