Active Users:502 Time:11/09/2026 03:14:32 PM
I was actually reading something about the whiskys Asia was churning out LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 25/01/2010 03:20:30 PM
The scots were being all snobby about "well it's not like it's REAL scotch!! It's made in Japan/Taiwan/China/wherever"

The crux of the issue was the right to use the term "Scotch", of course, and less the actual flavor. One point that was discussed though was that if the whisky TASTES like scotch and holds true to the production methods, it should have the right to be labeled Scotch. I believe the counterargument (reading between the lines) had to do with putting Scottish coopers out of business and a great deal of indignant pride.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
/ Booze: And the best whisky comes from? - 25/01/2010 02:34:43 PM 851 Views
I was actually reading something about the whiskys Asia was churning out - 25/01/2010 03:20:30 PM 400 Views
It's a protected label in the EU - 25/01/2010 03:47:29 PM 558 Views
I still haven't decided if I approve of protected labels. - 25/01/2010 04:41:45 PM 475 Views
Normally it would be a trade mark - 25/01/2010 04:56:59 PM 391 Views
No, I am not missing that. - 25/01/2010 05:02:04 PM 363 Views
Partly - 25/01/2010 05:09:25 PM 372 Views
So then if a Scotch Whisky is made in Scotland... - 25/01/2010 05:32:42 PM 501 Views
But the Taiwanese brand doesn't meet the standards for Scotch. - 25/01/2010 05:54:43 PM 392 Views
I mean the standards of taste and quality - 25/01/2010 06:52:10 PM 388 Views
But that's not really the point, is it? - 25/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 354 Views
There's nothing snobby about protecting a brand which makes a lot of money for your country. - 25/01/2010 04:03:45 PM 545 Views
I didn't say that it was snobby to do that. - 25/01/2010 04:27:57 PM 425 Views
Re: I didn't say that it was snobby to do that. - 25/01/2010 04:51:43 PM 451 Views
You still get my point. - 25/01/2010 04:53:33 PM 350 Views
Why should they have to label it that? - 25/01/2010 04:59:13 PM 381 Views
Because Scotch indicates a type of Whisky, not ONLY its location. - 25/01/2010 05:09:09 PM 383 Views
There is, as far as I'm aware, nothing stopping them from doing that. - 25/01/2010 05:13:14 PM 389 Views
And see, there's a difference in my mind. - 25/01/2010 05:18:33 PM 390 Views
I guess so - 25/01/2010 05:21:19 PM 401 Views
I so knew someone was going to say something along those lines 9_9 - 25/01/2010 05:35:59 PM 388 Views
Now you have egg on your face - 26/01/2010 11:30:31 AM 375 Views
You also should add that it is protecting the consumer - 25/01/2010 04:34:22 PM 382 Views
again, though, there's no need to be rude - 25/01/2010 04:42:27 PM 384 Views
I imagine so - 25/01/2010 04:58:40 PM 396 Views
yes, how dare people make their own scotch. - 25/01/2010 05:14:58 PM 382 Views
They moved to Scotland to make it then? - 25/01/2010 05:20:10 PM 386 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 05:38:49 PM 157 Views
Re: You also should add that it is protecting the consumer - 25/01/2010 05:37:30 PM 423 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 05:39:12 PM 169 Views
Pfft - 26/01/2010 10:20:58 AM 393 Views
Re: Pfft - 26/01/2010 10:22:52 AM 432 Views
Re: Pfft - 26/01/2010 11:17:31 AM 396 Views
Indeed - 26/01/2010 05:41:30 PM 374 Views
I am not a fan of protectionism but - 25/01/2010 05:59:36 PM 392 Views
the bartender *NM* - 28/01/2010 09:28:25 AM 202 Views

Reply to Message