Active Users:866 Time:06/08/2025 11:40:09 AM
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM
Suggesting that a gay judge ruling on the legality of gay marriage bans equates to a heterosexual judge hearing a divorce case doesn't track. Maybe to a heterosexual judge who believes marriage is "until death do us part" and strongly opposes divorce, but that view might just prejudice his ruling. You can't have judges ruling on the legality of laws that directly touch their interests; that seems to me a clear CONFLICT of INTEREST. Are we honestly to believe it's never once going to cross his mind that if the law stands it will be illegal for him to marry the partner of his choice?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 982 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 329 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 572 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 585 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 562 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 555 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 633 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 548 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 546 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 216 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 575 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 602 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 583 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 547 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 562 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 233 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 551 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 524 Views

Reply to Message