But from the viewpoint of fighting a war, the guy shooting at your convoy is by definition a bad guy.
And I think most of us recognize that dimension on a basic level; few would condone life imprisonment of enemy soldiers simply for BEING enemy soldiers, but that seems quite reasonable to me for proven terrorists. Another of the differences, in fact; armies will naturally try to liberate POW camps if practical, but the existence of POWs does not, in itself, become an additional cause for war, because all sides know POWs will ultimately be released after hostilities end.
It's really a pretty basic difference: The enemy soldier and the terrorist are both your foe, but one of them tries to stop you by killing you; the other is too cowardly for that and instead tries to murder your kids so you stop yourself. That's why Sgt. York got a medal and Lt. Calley got a court martial.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t.
- 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM
1922 Views
Lot of BS in there
- 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM
712 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this.
- 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM
650 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart.
- 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM
609 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety.
- 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM
635 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM
242 Views
I did note the rampant bias.
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
722 Views
- 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM
722 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier...
- 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
647 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers?
- 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM
779 Views
I would agree with this.
- 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM
697 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later.
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
741 Views
- 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM
741 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions"
- 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM
623 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe.
- 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM
615 Views
I think you missed the point.
- 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM
613 Views
One of us did.
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
790 Views
- 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM
790 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY
- 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM
619 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally.
- 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM
672 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC
- 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM
808 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason.
- 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM
762 Views
WTF? Are these people serious?
- 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM
644 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM
256 Views
So I presume the article meant to highlight that Muslim American citizens aren't all that violent?
- 03/02/2010 04:17:06 AM
685 Views
How many other attacks killed almost 3,000 people of over 90 different nations?
- 03/02/2010 06:26:23 AM
690 Views
