Active Users:480 Time:01/11/2026 01:49:57 AM
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM
Even if he upheld the ban people would say he only did it because he felt he had no choice due to his personal background.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay - 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM 1282 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM* - 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM 475 Views
Hmm that's a tough one. - 11/02/2010 03:18:54 AM 802 Views
I am not questioning the judge ability to rule fairly. - 11/02/2010 04:21:16 AM 841 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way - 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM 797 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold? - 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM 808 Views
California Supreme Court's ruling - 11/02/2010 05:42:35 AM 882 Views
This is federal court - 11/02/2010 02:22:58 PM 807 Views
Well, well, well, how the turn tables - 11/02/2010 05:00:56 AM 779 Views
Spin it DJ!!! *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:27:38 AM 325 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself. - 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM 814 Views
I should keep my nose out. - 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM 858 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests. - 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM 858 Views
Yeah. - 11/02/2010 02:08:15 PM 821 Views
A lot of recusement is about self preservation, I think. - 15/02/2010 01:05:38 PM 820 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM 354 Views
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome. - 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM 784 Views
He should recuse himself - 11/02/2010 02:41:24 PM 796 Views
Just for that I'm changing my mind! - 15/02/2010 01:07:29 PM 771 Views

Reply to Message