... and most of it was far away from any regular news access, just a bit of headlines news in the D-fac
Pretty much there was some political firings of US Attorneys, done by one of Alberto Gonzales aids, he actually push for her to do the firing. Congress found about it and did congressional hearings. Alberto Gonzales even though had weeks to prepare spent the entire 4 hour hearing said he didn't recall anything about the events event though his emails showed he was intimately involved in the political firings.
[QUOTE]In several hours before the Judiciary Committee on Thursday, Gonzales said he had done nothing improper in firing the eight prosecutors, but conceded the case had been badly handled. At the same time, he said 71 times that he either could not recall or did not remember conversations or events surrounding the dismissals.[/QUOTE]
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-04-20-gonzales-prosecutors_N.htm
------------------------------
Alberto Gonzales also outright lied concerning NSA Domestic eavesdropping program, James B. Comey (deputy attorney general during the 1st bush term), and the night Ashcroft (the 1st attorney general) was in hospital, Comey was acting AG and Gonzales tried to go to the drugged out Ashcroft trying to get Ashcroft to overrule Comey even though Ashcroft was recovering from surgery.
Some joke at the time that virtually every senator of the many running chose to vote 'present' on a senate bill calling for resignation, IIRC both Obama and McCain did. Well, a person, especially the AG, lying to congress - different than don't recall or no comment - is breaking the law I think, if that's the case I'm fairly unsympathetic toward the man. When all this went down I would have been catching up on my sleep and beer in Germany from 14 months of mega-suck so I'm not surprised my knowledge of him is limited to 'resigned under fire', which I think backs up my point that the AG shouldn't be ducking and weaving in front of congress, I'm hardly surprised one has, I imagine many have, but I'd maintain that answering questions from congress pertaining to how the administration would handle a given legal hypothetical is a pretty central duty of the Attorney General, wouldn't you? I'm not saying they have to give an ironclad answer, but rejecting the question as impossible when it certainly doesn't appear to be and when it's hardly out of left field doesn't seem to meet the high standard of the office and previous occupant's failings isn't an excuse from criticism, IMHO.
P.S. Thanks for the article, only had a chance to skim it thus far but I've bookmarked it and his wiki for perusal tomorrow.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
AG Eric Holder evades questioning
- 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM
818 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights?
- 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM
593 Views
Why should location matter when dealing with a borderless threat like al-Qaeda? *NM*
- 17/03/2010 10:20:08 PM
226 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality?
- 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM
547 Views
Line 1
- 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM
729 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention.
- 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM
616 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game.
- 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
540 Views
Well, I guess it depends whether you want to try him, doesn't it?
- 19/03/2010 11:34:34 PM
519 Views
*shrugs*
- 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM
551 Views
That doesn't seem very logical
- 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM
635 Views
That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute)
- 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM
592 Views
It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM
506 Views
Re: It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM
610 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM*
- 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM
240 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure
- 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM
535 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys
- 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM
549 Views
I remember a little of that
- 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM
525 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress
- 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM
514 Views
Seems he could answer the question without evasion or producing a soundbite
- 18/03/2010 04:12:04 AM
586 Views
I don't think I agree with that.
- 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM
528 Views
Fair enough
- 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM
531 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect.
- 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
550 Views
do we know how much he actually knows?
- 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM
527 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM*
- 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM
226 Views
that was totally not my question
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
536 Views
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
536 Views
Most people include congressmen/women don't understand Miranda rights,most people don't know the Law
- 18/03/2010 02:08:10 AM
602 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering.
- 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM
598 Views
I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner.
- 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM
485 Views
